因素结构,群体不变性和来自美国大学生饮食行为尺度的分数的同时有效性
Dylan K Richards1, Matthew R Pearson1, 1
1Center on Alcohol, Substance use, And Addictions (CASAA), University of New Mexico, 2650 Yale Blvd SE, Albuquerque, NM 87109, United States of America.
Eating behaviors
|May 16, 2024
概括
这项研究验证了大学饮食行为量表 (CEDBS) 用于评估大学生的饮食和酒精干扰 (FAD). 该尺度可靠地测量与酒精和饮食有关的行为,支持FAD研究.
科学领域:
- 行为科学 行为科学
- 临床心理学 临床心理学
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
背景情况:
- 饮食和酒精障碍 (FAD) 涉及饮食和饮酒行为之间的复杂相互作用.
- 准确的评估工具对于理解和解决FAD至关重要.
- 现有研究强调了大学人群中需要验证的措施.
研究的目的:
- 评估大学饮食行为量表 (CEDBS) 的因子结构,可靠性和有效性.
- 为了检查规模的不变性跨多种不同的人口学子组.
- 为了确定尺度与酒精使用和饮食障碍风险的同时有效性.
主要方法:
- 一个大样本的大学生 (n=2610) 完成了21项CEDBS.
- 分析了包括因子结构和组不变性在内的心理测量属性.
- 同时有效性被评估使用酒精使用,后果和饮食障碍风险的措施.
主要成果:
- CEDBS (替代方法,补偿卡路里,更快的中毒) 的三因素模型证明了充分的适应.
- 在CEDBS中,在各种人口群体中显示了标量不变性.
- 快速中毒与酒精风险相关; 抵消与饮食障碍风险相关的卡路里.
结论:
- 该CEDBS是一个心理测量声音仪器,用于评估FAD在大学生.
- 该尺度的验证因子为FAD组件提供了细微的见解.
- 这些发现支持CEDBS对大学生心理健康和物质使用的研究.
更多相关视频
09:00Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
Published on: August 16, 2024
756
15:00A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
Published on: February 7, 2025
553
相关概念视频
Cross-Sectional Research
11.3K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.3K
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Surveys
14.8K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.8K
Factorial Design
13.0K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.0K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
