细颗粒和粗颗粒对特定原因的脑血管死亡率的影响的区别:个体级别的案例交叉研究
Yifeng Qian1, Xiaozhen Su2, Huiting Yu3
1Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, China.
Ecotoxicology and environmental safety
|May 17, 2024
概括
短期接触细颗粒物 (PM2.5) 和粗颗粒物 (PM2.5-10) 会增加脑血管疾病的死亡率. 缺血性中风和中风后果的风险特别高,对女性和老年人影响更大.
科学领域:
- 环境健康 环境健康
- 流行病学 流行病学
- 心血管研究研究心血管研究
背景情况:
- 短期暴露于细颗粒物 (PM2.5) 和粗颗粒物 (PM2.5-10) 与增加脑血管疾病风险有关.
- 对于PM2.5和PM2.5-10对特定类型的脑血管疾病的影响的差异性了解有限.
研究的目的:
- 调查短期暴露于PM2.5和PM2.5-10与脑血管疾病死亡率之间的关联.
- 探索PM2.5和PM2.5-10对各种脑血管疾病亚型的潜在差异性影响.
主要方法:
- 利用来自中国上海 (2005-2021) 的个人脑血管死亡记录.
- 使用个人级别,时间分层,案例交叉设计与分布式滞后模型 (最大滞后7天).
- 分析了使用条件后勤回归的关联,探索按性别,年龄和季节的效果修改.
主要成果:
- 总共分析了388,823例脑血管疾病死亡.
- PM2.5的10μg/m3增加与所有脑血管疾病 (1.35%),缺血性中风 (1.84%) 和中风后续 (1.53%) 的死亡率增加有关.
- 对于PM2.5-10,观察到类似的增加,女性,80岁以上的个体和温暖的季节中更大的关联.
结论:
- 短期暴露在PM2.5和PM2.5-10中独立地增加了脑血管疾病死亡风险.
- 缺血性中风和中风后果似乎特别容易受到颗粒物暴露的影响.
相关概念视频
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...


