Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

37
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
37
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

50
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
50
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

361
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
361
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

177
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
177
Residuals and Least-Squares Property01:11

Residuals and Least-Squares Property

7.3K
The vertical distance between the actual value of y and the estimated value of y. In other words, it measures the vertical distance between the actual data point and the predicted point on the line
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
7.3K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

DrugUtilisation: An R Package to Support Drug Utilisation Research Using the OMOP Common Data Model.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026
Same authorSame journal

PDA (Privacy-Preserving Distributed Algorithms) in action: ten principles for high-quality multi-site clinical evidence generation.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same author

Health Data Quality Skill Gaps and Training Needs Among European Health Data Stakeholders: Cross-Sectional Survey.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Reconciling fast Hepatitis B evolutionary rates with ancient co-divergence.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Global approaches to infectious disease surveillance and modeling.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Loss function influence on hyperparameter optimization for observational healthcare prediction models.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

对大型观测健康数据的线性模型进行惩罚方法比较.

Egill A Fridgeirsson1, Ross Williams1, Peter Rijnbeek1

  • 1Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
|May 20, 2024
PubMed
概括

L1和ElasticNet规范化方法为医疗预测提供了更好的区别. 基于L0的方法,如代硬值 (Iterative Hard Thresholding, IHT) 和破碎适应 (Broken Adaptive Ridge, BAR) 提供了更简单,更易于解释的模型,并具有更好的校准.

关键词:
校准校准的时间歧视是一种歧视.电子健康记录是电子健康记录.逻辑回归的逻辑回归方法规范化 规范化 规范化

更多相关视频

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.1K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.1K

科学领域:

  • 医疗保健中的机器学习
  • 统计建模 统计建模
  • 预测分析是一种预测分析.

背景情况:

  • 后勤回归被广泛用于医疗预测.
  • 规范化技术对于优化模型性能和防止过度装配至关重要.
  • 评估各种规范化方法对于选择最有效的方法至关重要.

研究的目的:

  • 为了比较不同后勤回归规范化变体的区分和校准性能.
  • 评估这些方法在医疗预测模型中的内部和外部验证.
  • 引导规范化技术的选择,以提高预测准确性和可解释性.

主要方法:

  • 利用5个美国索赔和电子健康记录数据库对主要抑郁症患者群体的数据.
  • 使用L1,L2,ElasticNet,自适应L1,自适应ElasticNet,破碎的自适应 (BAR) 和代硬值 (IHT) 开发和外部验证的后勤回归模型.
  • 采用75%/25%的火车测试分割,并使用歧视 (AUC) 和校准指标评估性能,并通过弗里德曼测试和关键差异图进行统计分析.

主要成果:

  • L1和ElasticNet的规范化表现出优越的内部和外部歧视性能.
  • BAR和IHT方法表现出最好的内部校准,尽管没有任何一种方法导致外部校准.
  • 虽然IHT和BAR稍微不那么有歧视性,但与L1和ElasticNet相比,它们显著降低了模型复杂性和特征数量.

结论:

  • L1和ElasticNet为医疗保健中的物流回归提供了最佳的区分性能,确保了内部和外部验证的稳定性.
  • 基于L0的方法 (IHT,BAR) 有利于创建更简单,更易于解释的模型,并增强节和校准.
  • 这些发现有助于为医疗预测模型选择适当的规范化技术,平衡预测性能,模型复杂性和可解释性.