对腐败的容忍和描述性的社会规范:对贪污的实验研究
1China Center for Behavioral Economics and Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
PloS one
|May 20, 2024
概括
广泛的腐败规范增加了公众对腐败行为的容忍度. 这项研究表明,描述性的社会规范影响宽容,特别是在学生干部中,影响他们对腐败的倾向.
科学领域:
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 犯罪学 犯罪学
背景情况:
- 公众对腐败的容忍度显著影响了腐败的普遍性.
- 社会规范对腐败容忍度发展的影响还未得到充分研究.
研究的目的:
- 调查描述性社会规范如何影响公众对腐败的容忍.
- 检查被认为广泛的腐败对个人行为和态度的影响.
主要方法:
- 利用一个不对称的信息最后通游戏来模拟贪污者与公民之间的互动.
- 在行为实验中使用框架效应来操纵描述性的社会规范.
- 在基于规范的评估中分析了关于受害者遵守规则的游戏理论预测.
主要成果:
- 描述性规范表明广泛的腐败导致对腐败行为的容忍度增加.
- 学生干部接触到等级框架显示了关于贪污和增加宽容的高度信念.
- 这个子组也表现出更倾向于参与贪污的倾向.
结论:
- 描述性的社会规范在塑造公众的容忍和对腐败的反应方面发挥着至关重要的作用.
- 了解社会规范是理解腐败行为的自我强化动态的关键.
- 调查结果强调了在反腐败战略中需要考虑社会标准的必要性.
更多相关视频
11:13The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
13.7K
11:51Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
15.1K
相关概念视频
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Conformity
45.1K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.1K
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.2K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.2K
Obedience
32.9K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.9K
Ethics in Research
23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
