一个渐进的方法,多标准的集团决策:N双极超软拓的前景
Sagvan Y Musa1, Baravan A Asaad2,3
1Department of Mathematics, College of Education, University of Zakho, Zakho, Iraq.
PloS one
|May 21, 2024
概括
本研究介绍了N-双极超软拓 (N-BHST),通过多意见方法增强决策. N-BHST改进了现有的模型,用于强大的和可适应的多标准集团决策 (MCGDM) 应用程序.
科学领域:
- 拓学的拓学
- 决策理论 决策理论
- 集合理论 集合理论
背景情况:
- N-超软拓 (N-HST) 和超软拓 (HST) 是已建立的框架.
- N-双极软拓 (N-BST) 在管理多参数函数方面存在局限性.
- 现有的决策模式可能缺乏稳定性和适应性.
研究的目的:
- 引入N双极超软拓 (N-BHST) 作为一个新的扩展.
- 在N-双极软拓 (N-BST) 中的地址限制.
- 通过多意见方法加强多标准集团决策 (MCGDM).
主要方法:
- 研究N双极超软拓 (N-BHST) 框架.
- 分析关闭,内部,外部和N-BHST内的边界等运算符.
- 检查N-BHST在多标准组决策 (MCGDM) 中的应用.
主要成果:
- N-BHST提供了多观点的方法,增强了稳健性和适应性.
- 该研究阐明了N-BHST运营商之间的相互关系.
- 与现有模型相比,N-BHST为MCGDM提供了一个改进的框架.
结论:
- N-双极超软拓 (N-BHST) 是拓空间的一个重大进步.
- 在N-BHST中,多观点的方法提高了决策过程.
- 通过一个数值示例,N-BHST在现实世界决策场景中展示了实用的实用性.
更多相关视频
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
5.7K
07:42An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
Published on: August 2, 2018
13.6K
相关概念视频
Decision Making
106
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
106
Groupthink
44.3K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.3K
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Heuristics
84
Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
84
Reason and Intuition
6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
