宗教的两极分化和对不可见的科学实体与宗教实体的信仰的辩护
Ayse Payir1, Gaye Soley2, Oya Serbest3
1Department of Psychology, Union College, Schenectady, New York, USA.
Child development
|May 22, 2024
概括
儿童和成年人更相信看不见的科学概念,而不是宗教概念. 这种差异与他们如何证明他们的信仰有关,专注于科学属性和宗教证词的属性.
科学领域:
- 认知发展 认知发展
- 宗教心理学的宗教心理学
- 科学传播是科学传播.
背景情况:
- 相信看不见的实体在儿童中很常见.
- 社会影响,如世俗主义和宗教,可以塑造这些信仰.
- 了解对科学与宗教实体的差异信心至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查儿童和成人对看不见的科学和宗教实体的信任.
- 探索土耳其儿童如何证明他们对这些实体的信仰是合理的.
- 检查社会背景在信仰形成中的作用.
主要方法:
- 对174名土耳其儿童 (5-11岁) 和他们的父母进行调查.
- 2021年在土耳其各个地区收集的数据.
- 分析的重点是信心水平和信念的理由策略.
主要成果:
- 与宗教团体相比,参与者对科学团体的存在表示更高的信心.
- 对科学实体的信仰是通过实体属性来证明的.
- 对宗教实体的信仰被证据来源证明是合理的.
结论:
- 儿童和成年人对无形实体的信心不同,这取决于它们是科学还是宗教.
- 证明策略各不相同,科学信仰强调属性,宗教信仰强调证据.
- 社会两极分化可能会影响孩子们接受和信任的证词类型.
相关概念视频
The Scientific Method
59.4K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.4K
Inductive Reasoning
60.4K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.4K
Scientific Laws and Theories
75.6K
Scientific Laws
75.6K
Statistical Significance
20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K


