流浪机器人的地位如何影响我们对接触的欲望? - 团队相互依赖的调节效应
Shilong Liao1, Long Lin1, Hairun Pei1
1School of Economics and Management, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, China.
Ergonomics
|May 23, 2024
概括
机器人错误会影响员工对接触的渴望,特别是当机器人具有高地位时. 团队的相互依赖可以缓解这些影响,影响人机协作动态.
科学领域:
- 人与机器人的交互
- 组织行为 组织行为
- 人工智能伦理学 人工智能伦理学
背景情况:
- 人工智能和传感器的进步使得工作场所的人机器人协作成为可能.
- 由于非结构化环境和任务复杂性,机器人错误是不可避免的.
- 了解员工对机器人错误的反应对于有效的协作至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查流浪机器人的状态如何影响员工对接触的欲望.
- 检查团队相互依存对员工对机器人错误的情绪的影响.
- 在人机协作中测试基于预期违规理论的假设.
主要方法:
- 通过实验性贴片方法 (EVM) 进行了一项跨组实验.
- 214名受试者参与了这项研究.
- 测试了关于流浪机器人状态,负面情绪和团队相互依存性的假设.
主要成果:
- 流浪机器人身份显著影响员工通过负面情绪的联系和支持机器人研究的愿望.
- 团队的相互依赖行为作为一个边界条件,调节流浪机器人状态对负面情绪的影响.
结论:
- 机器人状态设计是管理员工对协作环境中的错误反应的关键因素.
- 结果为优化人机团队动态和促进工作场所对机器人的接受提供了洞察力.
更多相关视频
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
693
06:17A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
Published on: October 17, 2019
4.9K
相关概念视频
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Relationship Formation
40.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.0K
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
