在阅读解释和叙事文本时推断行为的动力学上
1School of Computer Science and Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Republic of Korea.
Brain sciences
|May 25, 2024
概括
阅读理解包括推断. 这项研究发现,推断行为随着文本类型的变化而变化,对阅读障碍和没有阅读障碍的学生产生不同的影响,特别是在叙事文本中.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 教育心理学教育心理学
- 发展心理学 发展心理学
背景情况:
- 推断对于阅读理解至关重要.
- 了解不同文本类型的推断行为如何变化对于教育干预很重要.
- 之前的研究还没有充分探讨推断行为的性别特异性变化,特别是在阅读障碍的学生中.
研究的目的:
- 在阅读不同类型时检查推理行为的变化 (陈述与叙事).
- 为了比较阅读障碍 (RDs) 的学生和没有RDs的学生之间的推断行为.
- 为了调查在某种类型的阅读过程中,推断行为是否会发生变化.
主要方法:
- 量化推断行为 (尝试和正确的推断) 在28名学生与RDs和44名学生没有RDs.
- 在阅读阐述性和叙事性文本时测量推断率.
- 分析了每个类型的阅读早期与后期阶段的推断率的变化.
主要成果:
- 推理行为变化是取决于性别的.
- 在解释性文本阅读过程中,两组都没有显示出推理制造的显著变化.
- 在叙事文本阅读时,两组都增加了推断尝试;只有没有RD的学生显著增加了正确的推断.
结论:
- 阅读叙事文本与阐述文本相比,引发了不同的推断模式.
- 没有阅读障碍的学生在叙事阅读时表现出更强的能力,提高正确的推断率.
- 这些发现对设计有针对性的阅读计划有影响,以提高不同类型的学习者跨学科的理解能力.
更多相关视频
06:33Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
Published on: October 11, 2018
6.8K
05:54Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
Published on: October 18, 2018
6.2K
相关概念视频
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Hindsight Biases
3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.4K
Inductive Reasoning
60.4K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.4K
Reason and Intuition
6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Deductive Reasoning
55.2K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
55.2K
