迷失在翻译中:在线乳腺癌信息的多语言分析
Terry P Gao1, Kristen M HoSang1, Dianelys Tabla Cendra2
1Department of General Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
The Journal of surgical research
|May 28, 2024
概括
在线乳腺癌信息质量对于英语,西班牙语和中文发言人来说很差. 中国网站提供了最低质量的健康信息,突出了需要改进资源的需求.
科学领域:
- 在瘤学瘤学.
- 医疗信息学 医疗信息学
- 医学沟通 医学沟通
背景情况:
- 患者越来越多地使用互联网获取健康信息.
- 非英语说话者面临着独特的挑战,即获得可靠的在线健康内容.
- 在线乳腺癌信息的质量在很大程度上是未知的.
研究的目的:
- 评估和比较英语,西班牙语和中文患者在线乳腺癌信息的质量.
- 根据语言和来源,识别信息质量的差异.
- 评估在线乳腺癌资源的可靠性.
主要方法:
- 用英语,西班牙语和中文的关键乳腺癌术语搜索了三个搜索引擎.
- 包括每种语言60个独特的网站,按类型和来源分类.
- 使用美国医学协会杂志 (JAMA) 的基准标准和DISCERN工具评估网站质量.
- 已知健康在网上 (HON) 代码的存在和评估的评估者之间的可靠性.
主要成果:
- 英语网站的质量评分最高 (JAMA: 2.2,DISCERN: 3.5),而中国网站的质量评分最低 (JAMA: 1.0,DISCERN: 2.3).
- 大多数英语和西班牙语网站都来自美国,而中国网站则占33%.
- 仅在8.9%的网站上存在HON代码,这表明对质量标准的遵守程度有限.
结论:
- 在所有评估的语言中,在线乳腺癌信息的整体质量很差.
- 中国语言的乳腺癌资源表现最差的质量.
- 对于不同的语言群体来说,有必要提高在线乳腺癌信息的可靠性和质量.
相关概念视频
Cancer Survival Analysis
343
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
343
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
5.5K
Mice have long served as models for studying human biology and pathology because of their phylogenetic and physiological similarity with humans. They are also easy to maintain and breed in the laboratory, and hence, many inbred strains are now available for research. Studies on mice have contributed immeasurably to our understanding of cancer biology.
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
5.5K


