推理阶梯作为一种工具,以减少儿科临床实践中隐含的偏见
Beatrice E Lechner1,2, Stephanie K Kukora3,4, Autumn Fiester5
1Division of Neonatology, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, USA. blechner@wihri.org.
Pediatric research
|May 30, 2024
概括
推断阶梯 (LOI) 帮助医疗保健专业人员实时检测和纠正隐性偏见. 这种工具可以提高护理质量,减少新生儿重症监护室边缘患者群体的差异.
科学领域:
- 医学伦理 医学伦理
- 医疗保健的不平等 医疗保健的不平等
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
背景情况:
- 医疗保健专业人员间的隐性偏见会对患者的治疗结果产生负面影响,尤其对边缘化群体.
- 现有的偏差检测工具在临床环境中缺乏实时校正能力.
- 新生儿重症监护病房 (NICU) 经历了与护理质量差异相关的显著结果差异.
研究的目的:
- 引入推理阶梯 (LOI) 作为一种实用的工具,用于检测和减轻新生儿重症监护室 (NICU) 实践中的隐性偏见.
- 为了证明LOI如何识别基于隐含偏见的反循环,从而加剧或改善护理质量.
- 探索LOI在减少新生儿结果差异方面的潜力.
主要方法:
- 该研究提出了推理梯 (LOI) 作为一个"隐性偏差检测工具"用于NICU临床实践.
- 分析了两个常见的NICU病例,以说明LOI的应用.
- 研究了隐性偏见通过反循环影响护理质量的机制.
主要成果:
- 使用LOI可以揭示隐含偏见如何产生影响护理质量的积极或消极反循环.
- 微妙的偏见,当通过LOI放大时,可以导致患者护理的显著正面或负面转变.
- 应用 LOI 证明了一个潜在的途径,可以实时抵消隐性偏见.
结论:
- 推断阶梯 (LOI) 作为医疗保健提供者识别和抵消隐性偏见的有效工具.
- 使用LOI的实时偏差检测和纠正可以导致NICU中更公平,更高质量的护理.
- 通过像LOI这样的工具来解决隐性偏见对于减轻新生儿人口的健康差异至关重要.
相关概念视频
Patient-centered Care
2.0K
Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
2.0K
Critical Thinking II
2.8K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
2.8K
Critical Thinking I
3.3K
Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career...
3.3K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
242
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
242
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
92
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
92


