Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I

640
The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...
640
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

2.5K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
2.5K
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

227
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and...
227
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

284
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
284

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Are brief batteries able to identify aphasia in elderly people? A study with the ABLA Battery.

CoDAS·2026
Same author

Effects of tDCS and intensive behavioral therapy in a longevous individual with low education and subacute aphasia.

CoDAS·2026
Same author

Preliminary study of a Digital Brazilian Portuguese Speech Assessment Instrument: validity and reliability of imitation and naming tasks.

CoDAS·2026
Same author

Montreal Cognitive Assessment Hearing Impairment (MoCA-H) in Brazilian Portuguese: criterion and construct validity.

CoDAS·2025
Same author

Profiles of Early Expressive Phonological Skills-Brazilian Portuguese (PEEPS-BP): a diagnostic accuracy study.

CoDAS·2025
Same author

Montreal Cognitive Assessment Hearing Impairment (MoCA-H): cross-cultural adaptation to Brazilian Portuguese.

CoDAS·2025
Same journal

Voice disorder is recognized as an occupational disease.

CoDAS·2026
Same journal

Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and manual laryngeal therapy on muscle tension dysphonia: randomized clinical trial.

CoDAS·2026
Same journal

Validation and standardization of the Scale of Self-Perception of Central Auditory Processing Skills (EAPAC) - expanded.

CoDAS·2026
Same journal

Habitual lip and tongue posture in infants with Trisomy 21: characterization and associated factors.

CoDAS·2026
Same journal

Behavioral and functional aspects among public and private middle school students.

CoDAS·2026
Same journal

Assessing pragmatic abilities of small children with and without ASD diagnosis.

CoDAS·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

29.1K

文字与噪音测试:开发,验证和参考值.

Lidiéli Dalla Costa1, Ana Valéria de Almeida Vaucher2, Karina Carlesso Pagliarin1

  • 1Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM - Santa Maria (RS), Brasil.

CoDAS
|June 5, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

新的Word-with-Noise测试有效地评估临床使用的噪音中的语音识别. 它证明了标准的有效性,并为区分听力能力提供了参考值.

更多相关视频

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

377
Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice
08:51

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice

Published on: May 10, 2019

11.7K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

29.1K
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

377
Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice
08:51

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice

Published on: May 10, 2019

11.7K

科学领域:

  • 听力学 听力学是指听力学.
  • 语音语言病理学 语言病理学

背景情况:

  • 在杂的环境中评估语音识别对于诊断听力障碍至关重要.
  • 现有的测试可能缺乏临床环境的有效性或特定应用策略.

研究的目的:

  • 引入单词与噪音测试,用于在竞争性噪音条件下评估语音识别.
  • 建立其临床应用策略,标准有效性和参考值.

主要方法:

  • 单词与噪音测试分为三个阶段,包括材料组织和战略定义.
  • 标准的有效性和参考值通过测试50名正常听觉的成年人和12名听力损失的人来确定.

主要成果:

  • 该测试使用单音节/单音节单词与语音频谱噪音.
  • 应用策略包括在55dBHL确定语音识别值.
  • 测试显示了足够的标准有效性,并确定了参考值 (单音节词的SNR为1.47dB,异音节词的SNR为-2.02dB).

结论:

  • 单词与噪音测试是用于听觉学实践的快速和可解释的工具.
  • 它提供了令人满意的标准有效性和已确定的临床使用参考值.