在高风险的没有血液动力学不稳定的NSTEMI患者中,非常早期与延迟的侵入性策略:来自KAMIR-NIH的洞察力
Seung Do Lee1, Rock Bum Kim2, Chang-Ok Seo1
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea.
PloS one
|June 6, 2024
概括
对于没有不稳定的高风险非ST升高心肌梗塞 (NSTEMI) 患者,非常早期的入侵策略 (VEIS) 显示出比延迟的入侵策略 (DIS) 更糟糕的结果. 这表明DIS对于这些特定的NSTEMI患者可能更安全.
科学领域:
- 心脏病学 心脏病学
- 干预心脏病学 干预心脏病学
- 临床研究 临床研究
背景情况:
- 在高风险的非ST升高心肌梗塞 (NSTEMI) 中,穿皮冠状动脉干预 (PCI) 的最佳时间仍在争论中.
- 建议早期进行再血管,但非常早期入侵策略 (VEIS) 与延迟入侵策略 (DIS) 的好处需要在特定的患者亚组中进一步调查.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较没有血液动力学不稳定的NSTEMI患者接受VEIS (≤12小时) 与DIS (>12小时) 的临床结果.
- 评估风险分层对NSTEMI中不同侵入性策略的结果的影响.
主要方法:
- 总共有4733名来自韩国急性心肌梗塞登记-国家卫生研究院 (KAMIR-NIH) 的NSTEMI患者被分析.
- 根据全球急性冠状动脉事件注册表 (GRACE) 风险评分 (GRS) 将患者分为低风险和高风险组.
- 包括所有原因死亡,心脏病死亡,复发性心脏病发作和12个月后脑血管事故在内的结果被评估为VEIS和DIS组.
主要成果:
- 在低GRS组中,VEIS和DIS在12个月后显示了类似的结果.
- 在高GRS组中,VEIS与DIS (HR=1.46,P=0.003) 相比,与明显更糟糕的全因死亡结果有关.
- 倾向性得分匹配证实了VEIS在高风险患者中的不良影响 (HR=1.34,P=0.042).
结论:
- 非常早期的侵入性策略 (VEIS) 与高风险的无血液动力学不稳定性NSTEMI患者的延迟侵入性策略 (DIS) 相比,与更糟糕的临床结果有关.
- 这些发现表明,在现实实践中,对于选择高风险的NSTEMI患者来说,延迟的侵入性治疗方法可能是更好.
相关概念视频
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) encompasses a spectrum of heart conditions caused by sudden obstruction of coronary arteries, typically resulting from the rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque and subsequent thrombus (blood clot) formation. This obstruction can lead to partial or complete blockage of blood flow, causing varying degrees of myocardial ischemia or infarction.ACS includes the following clinical entities:Unstable Angina (UA)Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)ST-Elevation...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Diagnosing acute coronary syndrome or ACS begins with a thorough patient history. Notable symptoms include central, crushing chest pain radiating to the left arm, neck, jaw, or back, along with shortness of breath, sweating (diaphoresis), nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and palpitations.It is crucial to note any history of cardiac illnesses and assess risk factors, including age, gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and a sedentary lifestyle.During physical examination, vital...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
IntroductionThe management of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) aims to minimize myocardial damage, preserve myocardial function, and prevent complications.Initial ManagementInpatient management involves continuous cardiac monitoring, preferably in an ICU, focusing on blood pressure, serum sodium, potassium, and creatinine levels, and urine output. Ongoing pharmacologic management is crucial for stabilizing the patient.Supplemental Oxygen: Administer supplemental oxygen if oxygen saturation is...
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina, a symptom of myocardial ischemia, requires a structured nursing management approach to ensure effective care and prevent complications like myocardial infarction. Comprehensive nursing care involves assessing, diagnosing, planning, implementing interventions, and evaluating outcomes, all tailored to the individual patient's needs.Patient AssessmentNursing assessment begins with a detailed subjective evaluation of symptoms, which typically include chest pain or pressure radiating to the...


