大学室友对学业成绩的不同质的同行影响
Yi Cao1,2, Tao Zhou3,4, Jian Gao5,6,7,8
1CompleX Lab, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Nature communications
|June 6, 2024
概括
大学室友显著影响彼此的学业成绩,随着时间的推移,效应会得到加强. 同龄人之间的相似性放大了这些积极的同龄人效应,影响了学生的成功.
科学领域:
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
- 教育研究教育教育研究
- 高等教育研究 高等教育研究
背景情况:
- 了解同伴对学生学习的影响对于教育管理至关重要.
- 静态数据限制了对复杂的对等效应和关系的分析.
- 纵向数据和任务中的合理随机性是研究同行影响的关键.
研究的目的:
- 调查大学室友对本科生学术成绩的影响.
- 使用纵向数据和统计建模量化对等效应.
- 探索同龄人之间的相似性和同居时间如何影响学术同化.
主要方法:
- 利用了5,272名在宿舍分配的本科生的纵向数据.
- 使用零模型和回归分析来检查对等效应.
- 开发了一个同化度量来衡量室友之间的学术表现相似性.
主要成果:
- 室友的学术表现显示出明显高于偶然预测的相似性.
- 同伴的影响在同居期间加剧.
- 同龄人相似性缓和了室友以前的表现对学生未来表现的积极影响.
结论:
- 室友关系对学生的学业成绩产生了可衡量的影响.
- 共同生活的持续时间和学业成绩的相似性加强了同行影响.
- 同行异质性在塑造高等教育中的同行影响力学方面发挥着至关重要的作用.
相关概念视频
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Cross-Sectional Research
11.3K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.3K
Relationship Formation
40.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.0K
Correlations
32.8K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
32.8K
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K


