相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

在美国青少年和年轻人中测量残疾:一项调查测量实验

Jonathan A Schulz^1,2, Jean P Hall³, Julia C West^1,4

¹Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.

Preventive medicine reports

|June 7, 2024

概括

根据使用的调查问题,青少年和年轻成年人的残疾患病率 (AYA) 显著不同. 华盛顿小组 - 短集 (WG-SS) 确定了更多的残疾比单项措施,强调需要更好的AYA残疾评估工具.

科学领域:

公共卫生监督公共卫生监督
衡量残疾人的方法
青少年和年轻人的健康

背景情况:

在调查中识别残疾依赖于各种各样的问题集,对其可靠性的理解有限.
根据不同年龄组,包括青少年和年轻人 (AYA),对残疾患病率的估计可能会有很大差异.
需要了解不同的残疾措施如何影响AYA人口中的患病率估计.

研究的目的:

用两个不同的残疾问题集来评估青少年和年轻成年人 (AYA) 中残疾的患病率.
评估AYA人口中这些不同残疾指标的可靠性和可比性.
将AYA残疾患病率估计与已建立的调查中的国家数据进行比较.

主要方法:

在政策和沟通评估 (PACE) 佛蒙特研究中的青少年和年轻人 (AYA) 在2021年完成了一项单项残疾问题 (类似于NSHD/HRMS) 和华盛顿小组短集 (WG-SS).
对青少年 (12-17) 和年轻成年人 (18-25) 估计了任何残疾和特定残疾领域的患病率.
这些估计与来自国家健康访谈调查 (NHIS) 和国家药物使用和健康调查 (NSDUH) 的国家数据进行了比较.

主要成果:

工作小组确定了较高的残疾患病率:17.0%的AYA青少年和22.0%的AYA年轻人.
这些WG-SS估计与国家青少年数据一致 (NSDUH:17.9%),但超过了年轻成年人估计 (NHIS:3.9%;NSDUH:12.9%).
单项问题给出了较低的估计 (青少年:6.9%;年轻人:18.5%),与WG-SS相比,协议较差.

结论:

青少年和年轻人的残疾患病率 (AYA) 在很大程度上取决于所使用的测量工具.
与多域WG-SS相比,单项残疾问题低估了这一年龄组的患病率.
改善残疾监测需要验证新的措施,特别是AYA之间,以捕捉全面的功能限制.

关键词:

青少年青少年青少年障碍障碍是指残疾人的残疾.测量方法测量方法调查调查调查调查年轻的成年人年轻的成年人

更多相关视频

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children

Published on: March 1, 2019

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

相关概念视频

Surveys

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.

Group Design

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...