2个简短的体育活动问卷在种族不同的成年人有效性和可靠性标准
Norberto N Quiles1, David Uher2, Anoop Balachandran1
1Department of Family, Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, Queens College of the City University of New York (NY), Queens, NY, USA.
Journal of physical activity & health
|June 7, 2024
概括
运动生命体征 (EVS) 和身体活动生命体征 (PAVS) 调查问卷显示,与测量各种成人身体活动的加速度计的相关性很弱. 在这些人群中使用这些问卷时,建议谨慎使用.
科学领域:
- 运动生理学 运动生理学
- 公共卫生研究 公共卫生研究
- 收集生物医学数据收集
背景情况:
- 准确测量身体活动对公共健康至关重要.
- 像运动生命体征 (EVS) 和体育活动生命体征 (PAVS) 这样的问卷通常用于评估中度至剧烈强度的体育活动 (MVPA).
- 与加速计等客观指标的验证是必不可少的,特别是在不同的人群中.
研究的目的:
- 通过EVS和PAVS问卷测量的MVPA与加速度计进行比较.
- 评估EVS和PAVS在不同种族的成年人中的可靠性.
主要方法:
- 99个不同种族的成年人穿着加速度计7天.
- 参与者在测量期间的开始 (T1) 和结束 (T2) 填写了EVS和PAVS问卷.
- 斯皮尔曼rho相关性,类内相关系数,灵敏度和特异性被用于分析.
主要成果:
- 在加速器测量MVPPA和T2.2时的EVS (ρ = .263) 和PAVS (ρ = .327) 之间发现了弱正相关性.
- 敏感度为EVS的73.2%,PAVS的82.6%,两者的特异性为35.3%.
- EVS显示出良好的可靠性 (ICC = .855),而PAVS显示出适度的可靠性 (ICC = .652).
结论:
- 在EVS和PAVS问卷中,对各种成年人的MVPA评估加速计的同意程度有限.
- 虽然EVS表现出良好的可靠性和PAVS中度可靠性,但它们的低特异性表明身体活动水平的潜在高估.
- 由于观察到的局限性,EVS和PAVS在种族多样化的群体中的临床和研究使用需要仔细考虑.
相关概念视频
02:16Surveys
14.7K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.7K
01:29Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K