在数据集和模型中对思维链推理策略的比较
Konstantin Hebenstreit1, Robert Praas2, Louis P Kiesewetter3
1Medical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Data Science, Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Vienna, Austria.
PeerJ. Computer science
|June 10, 2024
概括
思想链 (CoT) 推理可以改进大型语言模型 (LLM). 这项研究发现,在新一代的LLM和多样化的数据集中,CoT策略是强大的,提高了性能和可解释性.
科学领域:
- 人工智能的人工智能
- 自然语言处理自然语言处理.
背景情况:
- 在大型语言模型 (LLM) 中出现的思维链 (CoT) 推理为提高性能和可解释性提供了潜力.
- 关于在不同LLM代和数据集中对CoT策略的概括性存在不确定性.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较各种零射击的有效性,促使COT推理策略.
- 评估六个最近的LLM和六个不同的问答数据集的战略概括性.
主要方法:
- 用不同的 CoT 推理策略进行零射击提示.
- 在六个LLM中进行测试:davinci-002,davinci-003,GPT-3.5-turbo,GPT-4,Flan-T5-xxl和Cohere命令-xlarge.
- 评估六个问题答案数据集,需要现实世界知识和逻辑口头推理,包括科学和医学领域.
主要成果:
- 尽管存在微小的差异,但CoT推理策略在各种LLM和数据集中表现出强大的有效性.
- GPT-4显示出最先进的推理策略的最大好处,特别是在使用自动发现提示符时.
- 该研究证实了Cot推理的广泛适用性和一致的好处.
结论:
- CoT推理策略是提高LLM绩效和可解释性的可靠方法.
- GPT-4表现出对先进推理技术的卓越适应.
- 进一步的研究可以探索针对各种LLM架构的优化CoT快速发现.
相关概念视频
Reason and Intuition
6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Deductive Reasoning
55.2K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
55.2K
Inductive Reasoning
60.4K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.4K
Reasoning
73
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
73
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
The Representativeness Heuristic
15.8K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
15.8K


