烟草使用对印度贫困的影响的定量探索
Rijo M John1, Estelle P Dauchy2
1Department of Social Work, Rajagiri College of Social Sciences, Kochi, India.
概括
烟草支出使1840万印度人陷入贫困,不成比例地影响了较低社会经济群体. 通过财政和非财政政策解决烟草使用问题对印度至关重要.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 卫生经济学 卫生经济学
- 贫困研究 贫困研究
背景情况:
- 烟草使用不成比例地影响印度较低社会经济群体.
- 减少贫困对印度来说是一个重大挑战,印度是全球22%以上贫困人口的家园.
研究的目的:
- 量化印度人由于直接的烟草支出和相关的医疗保健费用而陷入贫困的数量.
- 估计烟草使用在印度增加贫困概率的程度.
主要方法:
- 量化贫困增加的方法是乘以人数比率的差异 (有和没有烟草支出) 与人口规模.
- 员工倾向性得分匹配,以评估烟草使用对贫困可能性的影响.
主要成果:
- 由于与烟草有关的支出,大约有1840万印度人 (1.5%的人口) 陷入贫困.
- 吸烟增加了一个家庭被列为贫困家庭的概率3.4%至3.7%.
结论:
- 烟草支出加剧了印度的贫困,阻碍了国家减贫目标.
- 实施监管烟草使用的财政和非财政政策对于减少印度的贫困至关重要.
- 解决烟草使用问题对于实现全球和国内减贫目标至关重要.
更多相关视频
09:50Impact Assessment of Repeated Exposure of Organotypic 3D Bronchial and Nasal Tissue Culture Models to Whole Cigarette Smoke
Published on: February 12, 2015
11.2K
09:25Methods to Evaluate Cytotoxicity and Immunosuppression of Combustible Tobacco Product Preparations
Published on: January 10, 2015
11.4K
相关概念视频
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
353
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
353
Longitudinal Research
11.9K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
11.9K
Observational Studies
8.5K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
8.5K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
242
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
242
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques IV
28
Stress often leads to unhealthy habits like smoking, excessive drinking, and overeating, which offer short-term relief but ultimately increase long-term health risks. These behaviors create a cycle that temporarily lowers stress levels but can result in severe long-term health consequences. Breaking these habits is essential to reduce the risk of chronic diseases and improve overall well-being. Three primary changes that support better health include quitting smoking, reducing alcohol intake,...
28
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
162
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
162
