使用结构方程建模评估撞车倾向的决定因素:其他驾驶员引起的分心的作用
Sameen Zafar1, Muhammad Abdullah2, Muhammad Ashraf Javid3
1Suleman Dawood School of Business, Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS), Lahore 54792, Pakistan.
Journal of safety research
|June 10, 2024
概括
其他驾驶员 (DFD) 造成的分心增加了驾驶员的焦虑和压力,导致性能缺陷和更高的碰撞倾向. 解决侵略性驾驶问题对于道路安全至关重要.
科学领域:
- 交通安全 交通安全
- 驾驶员行为心理学 心理学
- 道路交通事故分析分析
背景情况:
- 侵略性驾驶是交通事故和严重伤害的一个重要因素.
- 其他司机 (DFD) 的外部干扰可以转移注意力,导致分心驾驶和增加碰撞风险.
- 由于DFD及其对撞车倾向的影响尚未得到充分研究,特别是在像南亚这样的地区,侵略性驾驶是常见的.
研究的目的:
- 评估其他驾驶员 (DFD) 引起的分心对驾驶员焦虑,性能和碰撞倾向的影响.
- 探索DFD,焦虑/压力 (AS),基于焦虑的绩效缺陷 (APD),敌对行为 (HB) 和与车辆相关的分心 (AVRD) 的可接受性之间的关联.
主要方法:
- 通过巴基斯坦拉合尔的一项调查收集的初级数据,有801个完整的答案.
- 结构方程建模 (SEM) 用于测试关于潜在因素之间的关系的假设.
- 研究了DFDs,AS,APD,HB,AVRD和碰撞倾向 (CP) 之间的关联.
主要成果:
- 发现DFD显著增加了驾驶员的焦虑和压力 (AS).
- 无论是DFD还是AS都与基于焦虑的绩效缺陷 (APD) 有积极的相关性.
- DFDs和AS显示出与碰撞倾向 (CP) 的积极关联,突出了激进驾驶,压力和事故之间的联系.
结论:
- 该研究提供了DFD对驾驶员状态和安全的不利影响的经验证据.
- 研究结果表明,针对攻击性驾驶行为的干预措施可以减少DFD并减轻碰撞风险.
- 结果可以为决策者和当局提供信息,通过解决侵略性驾驶来实施更安全道路的战略.
相关概念视频
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
39.0K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
39.0K
Determination of Expected Frequency
2.2K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.2K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
3.6K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
H0: The two variables (factors)...
3.6K
Attribution Theory
13.0K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.0K
Introduction to Test of Independence
2.2K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.2K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K


