Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

385
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
385
What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

11.4K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
11.4K
Biostatistics: Overview01:20

Biostatistics: Overview

238
Biostatistics plays a crucial role in understanding and analyzing data in healthcare and biology. Biostatisticians conduct experiments, gather evidence, and draw meaningful conclusions using statistical methods and techniques. Different variables form the foundation of biostatistical analysis, allowing researchers to understand and interpret data effectively. These variables are classified into different types, each serving a specific purpose in statistical analysis.
Discrete variables are...
238
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

288
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
288
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

162
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
162
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

92
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
92

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Mapping the landscape of dissemination and implementation science across the CTSA consortium: A multi-domain environmental website scan.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2026
Same author

Risk Factors for Left Atrial Thrombus in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Atrial Fibrillation.

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography·2026
Same author

Multimorbidity as a predictor of mortality in companion dogs.

GeroScience·2026
Same author

Telehealth Utilization Patterns among Patients with Chronic Conditions Across Age, Gender, Geography, and Insurance in Arkansas.

Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association·2026
Same author

LANTERN: Leveraging Local Ancestry Tracts to Enhance Rare-Variant Aggregate Association Testing.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

An integrated germline and somatic genomic model for coronary artery disease.

Nature communications·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K

综合主题专业知识用于因果效应估计中的变量选择:一个案例研究

Julia Debertin1,2, Javier A Jurado Vélez3, Laura Corlin1,4

  • 1From the Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|June 11, 2024
PubMed
概括

为共变量选择创建因果图 (DAG) 是至关重要的. 专注于DAG中的预后因素可以减少偏差和差异,改善对坚持的估计.

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

494
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.9K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

494
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.9K

科学领域:

  • 流行病学 流行病学
  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 因果推理因果推理

背景情况:

  • 因果图 (定向环形图 - DAG) 对于研究中的共变量选择至关重要.
  • 有限的应用研究存在于最佳的DAG创建方法.
  • 冠状动脉药物项目的试验数据被用来评估DAG创建方法.

研究的目的:

  • 评估创建DAG用于共变量选择的各种方法.
  • 评估不同的DAG创建策略对估计因果关系的影响.
  • 确定在DAG中识别变量和链接的最佳方法.

主要方法:

  • 开发了多个DAG来研究安慰剂坚持对死亡率的影响.
  • 在DAG中采用了各种用于变量和链接包含/排除的策略.
  • 识别了使用每一个DAG的因果效应估计的最小调整集.

主要成果:

  • 仅使用基线共变量,所有调整集都产生了类似的 (偏差) 估计.
  • 包括非混性预后因素在内,可以减少差异,而不会增加偏差.
  • 对时间变化的共变量进行调整,并进行反向概率加权,当DAG专注于预后因素时,表现最好.

结论:

  • 经验证实了DAG中对共变量选择的理论建议.
  • 不预测暴露的预测因素可以减少差异;不预测暴露的预测因素可能提供更少的偏差控制.
  • 建议在手工创建DAG时优先确定所有可能的结果预后因素.