在政治背景下禁止书籍:来自美国学校的证据
Marcelo S O Goncalves1, Isabelle Langrock2,3, Jack LaViolette4,5
1Duke University, Sanford School of Public Policy, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
PNAS nexus
|June 12, 2024
概括
美国学校的书籍禁令在2021-2022年激增,不成比例地针对有色人种作家的儿童书籍. 这一趋势似乎是象征性的政治行动,而不是审查,因为国家对禁书的兴趣不受影响.
科学领域:
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
- 政治科学 政治科学是指政治学.
- 教育政策 教育政策
背景情况:
- 在2021-2022学年,禁止书籍的事件在美国学区达到前所未有的水平.
- 审查和书籍禁令在党派政治话语中变得突出,但对它们的具体情况的经验研究有限.
研究的目的:
- 实证地调查最近美国学区书籍禁令激增的内容,预测因素和影响.
- 分析禁止书籍的特点及其作者和人物的人口特征.
主要方法:
- 在2021-2022学年期间,利用了PEN America对2532本书禁书的数据集.
- 综合县级行政数据,书籍级数字追踪数据,书籍销售数据和作者人口统计信息.
主要成果:
- 禁止的书籍不成比例地是由有色人种的作者和有色人种的特色人物写的,特别是在儿童文学中.
- 禁书在右倾县更为普遍,这些县正经历向较少保守主义的转变.
- 国家和州级对禁书的兴趣在禁书后没有显著的影响.
结论:
- 美国最近的书籍禁令似乎是象征性的政治行动,旨在动员特定的选民群体.
- 针对不同角色的低兴趣儿童书籍的目标表明有战略性的动机,而不是纯粹的压制性动机.
相关概念视频
Social Traps
22.3K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
22.3K
Bullying
8.4K
A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is...
8.4K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.1K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.1K
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
Punishment
173
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
173


