解读分歧:冲突的信息和政治意识形态如何塑造公众对PFAS法规的态度
1Department of Communication, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Journal of health communication
|June 13, 2024
概括
关于和多化物质 (PFAS) 的相互矛盾信息减少了公众对PFAS监管和缓解行为的支持. 这种效应在保守派中更为明显,这突显了需要一致的风险沟通的必要性.
科学领域:
- 环境科学 环境科学
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 风险沟通 风险沟通
背景情况:
- 和多化物质 (PFAS) 是一个日益严重的全球环境和健康问题.
- 了解公众对PFAS污染的看法和行为反应对于有效的政策和减缓至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查暴露于相互矛盾的信息如何影响公众对PFAS监管的态度.
- 检查相互矛盾的信息对个人参与与PFAS相关的个人缓解行为的意图的影响.
主要方法:
- 采用了单向,受试者之间的实验设计.
- 通过CloudResearch招募了1,062名美国成年人参与该研究.
- 参与者接触到有关PFAS风险和法规的一致或相互矛盾的信息.
主要成果:
- 与一致的信息相比,暴露于相互矛盾的信息导致人们对现有PFAS法规的态度不那么有利.
- 接触到相互矛盾的信息的个体显示出支持相关政策的意图减少,并参与缓解行为的行为.
- 政治意识形态起到了调节者的作用,保守的参与者表现出来自实验操纵的更强效应.
结论:
- 一致的风险信息对于公众对PFAS问题的理解和参与至关重要.
- 相互矛盾的信息可能会削弱公众对重要环境和卫生法规的支持.
- 有针对性的沟通策略可能是必要的,考虑到政治意识形态对风险感知的影响.
更多相关视频
07:06Investigating Long-Distance Transport of Perfluoroalkyl Acids in Wheat via a Split-Root Exposure Technique
Published on: September 28, 2022
1.6K
16:02Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
Published on: February 10, 2023
2.7K
相关概念视频
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Framing Effects
7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Types of Toxins
1.7K
Humans continually engage with an environment rich in potentially harmful chemicals. These are introduced to our bodies through inhalation, ingestion, or skin contact. These chemicals exist in various forms, such as air and environmental pollutants, agricultural chemicals, organic solvents, and heavy metals.
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...
1.7K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
162
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
162
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
