在种族多样化的社区中对COVID-19疫苗的犹:布拉德福德出生研究的描述性发现
Josie Dickerson1, Bridget Lockyer1, Rachael H Moss1
1Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
Wellcome open research
|June 14, 2024
概括
在英国布拉德福德的少数民族和贫困社区中,对COVID-19疫苗的犹是较高的. 解决错误信息和建立信任对于公平的疫苗推广和公共卫生至关重要.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 疫苗学 疫苗学 疫苗学
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
背景情况:
- 在英国,2019年新冠病毒病 (COVID-19) 疫苗的推广正在进行中.
- 包括少数民族和贫困地区在内的弱势群体表现出更高的疫苗犹.
- 不信任和错误信息可能会导致这些人群对疫苗的犹.
研究的目的:
- 为了调查布拉德福德的多元化和贫困人口中的COVID-19疫苗犹.
- 了解在布拉德福德出生 (BiB) 队列中影响疫苗接受和拒绝的因素.
主要方法:
- 在布拉德福德出生 (BiB) 研究计划 (n=1727) 中对父母进行了调查.
- 交叉表格分析了根据种族和社会经济贫困的疫苗犹的变化.
- 专题分析被用来解释疫苗犹的原因.
主要成果:
- 31%的受邀参与者 (n=535) 接受了调查.
- 根据种族和贫困程度,对疫苗的犹有很大差异.
- 巴基斯坦遗产的个人和那些在最贫困地区的人报告说,与白人英国人和较不贫困群体相比,接种疫苗的接受率较低.
- 犹的常见原因包括混乱和不信任,与错误信息暴露有关.
结论:
- 由于少数民族和贫困地区的犹不决,COVID-19疫苗接种计划有可能造成不公平的分配.
- 需要采取紧急干预措施来打击错误信息,并解决围绕COVID-19疫苗的不确定性.
关键词:
在布拉德福德出生.这就是Covid-19的原因.队伍的队伍是指队伍中的队伍.民族身份 民族身份健康信仰 关于健康的信仰在健康方面的不平等.贫困 贫困 贫困 贫困 贫困健康的社会决定因素在信任信任信任信任信任信任.疫苗的犹 疫苗的犹更多相关视频
11:31Rapid Fractionation and Isolation of Whole Blood Components in Samples Obtained from a Community-based Setting
Published on: November 30, 2015
16.0K
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.6K
相关概念视频
Surveys
14.7K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.7K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
238
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
238
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
162
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
162
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
30
Adolescents from ethnic minority backgrounds face a multifaceted journey in forming their identities, shaped by the intersections of cultural expectations and personal exploration. For these adolescents, identity formation involves not only typical developmental challenges but also navigating the perceptions and attitudes of the majority culture. As they grow, adolescents in ethnic minority groups often become increasingly aware of stereotypes, social biases, and discrimination, all of which...
30
Prevalence and Incidence
455
In statistical epidemiology and health sciences, two essential metrics—prevalence and incidence—are fundamental for understanding disease dynamics within a population. These measures enable public health officials, epidemiologists, and researchers to assess the burden of diseases, allocate resources effectively, and design impactful public health policies and interventions.
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
455
Study Designs in Epidemiology
211
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
211
