对友悖论进行全面的概括,以权重和属性
Anna Evtushenko1, Jon Kleinberg2,3
1Department of Information Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. anna@infosci.cornell.edu.
Scientific reports
|June 14, 2024
概括
友悖论,通常是关于网络中的节点级别,是概括的,包括加权边缘和其他节点属性. 新规则可以预测这些扩展悖论在复杂网络中何时成立.
科学领域:
- 网络科学 网络科学
- 图形理论 图形理论
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
背景情况:
- 友悖论指出,平均而言,你的朋友的朋友比你有更多的朋友.
- 这种悖论传统上只适用于简单的,未加权的,非定向的图形,仅专注于节点度.
- 许多现实世界的网络具有诸如边缘权重和各种节点属性等复杂的特征.
研究的目的:
- 将友悖论推广到节点度之外,包括加权边缘和其他数值节点属性.
- 将现有的友悖论概括统一成一个单一,连贯的理论框架.
- 开发标准来预测基于属性的友悖论扩展的有效性.
主要方法:
- 开发了一个统一的数学框架来概括友悖论.
- 引入了对加权边缘和非度数值节点属性的考虑.
- 采用理论分析,模拟和现实世界的网络数据分析.
主要成果:
- 一般化框架成功地结合了加权边缘和节点属性.
- 友情悖论的基于属性的扩展在随机属性分配时大约50%的时间失败.
- 建立了基于关联的规则,以确定基于属性的悖论的适用性.
结论:
- 友悖论可以扩展到更复杂的网络结构和属性.
- 这些扩展的有效性取决于特定的属性相关性,而不仅仅是网络拓.
- 该研究提供了对友悖论及其对网络分析的概括的全面理解.
更多相关视频
08:27Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
6.9K
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
691
相关概念视频
Relationship Formation
40.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.0K
The Representativeness Heuristic
15.8K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
15.8K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Weighted Mean
5.1K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
5.1K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
