婴儿和外国人导向言语的声学特征,用普通话作为目标语言
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|June 18, 2024
概括
在普通话中,婴儿导向语音 (IDS) 和外国人导向语音 (FDS) 与成人导向语音 (ADS) 相比,增强了音调和持续时间等声学特征. 这些修改可能有助于第一 (L1) 和第二 (L2) 语言的学习.
科学领域:
- 语言学的语言学.
- 语音科学 语言科学
- 语音学 语音学 语音学
- 语言获取 语言获取
背景情况:
- 语音输入质量显著影响第一 (L1) 和第二 (L2) 语言学习效率.
- 对于L1和L2学习来说,理解定向语音的修改 (婴儿定向语音[IDS]和外国人定向语音[FDS]) 是至关重要的.
- 标准普通话是一种音调语言,为检查这些语音修改提供了一个独特的背景.
研究的目的:
- 调查标准普通话婴儿导向语 (IDS) 和外国人导向语 (FDS) 与成人导向语 (ADS) 相比的声学修改.
- 探索IDS和FDS特征如何表现在非字体词和更长的话语中.
- 确定IDS和FDS中增强的特定声学参数,并比较IDS和FDS之间的差异.
主要方法:
- 标准普通话语语音样本的比较声学分析.
- 检查异音词和话语中的特征,重点关注带有音色的元音持续时间,基本频率 (F0) (平均值和范围),以及词汇音色轮.
- 将IDS和FDS与成年人导向演讲 (ADS) 的基线进行比较.
主要成果:
- 对于单词,与ADS相比,IDS和FDS显示了增强的音色载体母音持续时间,F0的平均值和范围,以及词汇音色轮.
- 一个值得注意的例外是普通话音调3,它在FDS下降,但在IDS相对于ADS保持不变.
- 在话语中,IDS的平均F0值更高,而FDS的总持续时间更长.
结论:
- 标准普通话中的IDS和FDS涉及到特定的声学增强,这些增强在单词级和话语级语音之间有所不同.
- 这些修改,特别是音调和时间特征的修改,可能在促进L1和L2语言获取方面发挥作用.
- 这些发现有助于理解语音输入的特征,这对于有效的语言学习至关重要.
更多相关视频
09:09Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
440
05:35Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
Published on: April 19, 2017
6.7K
相关概念视频
Language Development
341
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
341
Language and Cognition
342
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
342
