Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

44.3K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.3K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.6K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Conformity01:20

Conformity

45.1K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.1K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Comparison of survival outcomes for people with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer who received palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib with an aromatase inhibitor: a plain language summary.

Future oncology (London, England)·2026
Same author

Treatment outcomes with palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor in patients with metastatic breast cancer who also have cardiovascular diseases: a plain language summary.

Future oncology (London, England)·2026
Same author

Survivor Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence Integration in Breast Cancer Treatment: A Qualitative Study of Trust, Equity, and Application.

European journal of breast health·2026
Same author

Phase II Study of Adavosertib in Patients With Tumors Containing BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (EAY131) Subprotocol Z1I.

JCO precision oncology·2026
Same author

Multi-modal AI for comprehensive breast cancer prognostication.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Real-world treatment durations, subsequent treatments, and switching of CDK4/6 inhibitors among patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

The oncologist·2026
Same journal

Many multicenter randomized controlled trials do not account for center effect: a methodological review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Patient Acceptability of the Modified Zelen Approach to Randomized Trials - A Survey of the CAPS THA Cohort.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to SPICE-GRADE: simultaneous processing of indirect causal evidence in complex pathways using GRADE - an exploratory case study. [Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 194C (2026) 112219].

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Small numbers of clusters in cluster randomised trials: a scoping review of problems and proposed solutions.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

What's the Meta Now? More Updates on the Problems with Systematic Reviews.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

A scoping review of guidance on sharing trial results with patients and the public finds inconsistent recommendations and limited methodological development.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.1K

面板堆叠是对共识陈述有效性的威胁.

Kasper P Kepp1, Preben Aavitsland2, Marcel Ballin3

  • 1Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Journal of clinical epidemiology
|June 19, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

由于小组成员的偏见,共识陈述可能会误导,特别是在COVID-19建议中. 严格的证据综合和倡导冲突的透明度对于有效的共识至关重要.

关键词:
有竞争利益的利益.达成共识的声明 协商一致的声明基于证据的医学是基于证据的医学.准则 准则 准则 准则面板偏差 面板偏差 面板偏差透明度 透明度 透明度

更多相关视频

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.1K
Method to Visualize and Analyze Membrane Interacting Proteins by Transmission Electron Microscopy
10:49

Method to Visualize and Analyze Membrane Interacting Proteins by Transmission Electron Microscopy

Published on: March 5, 2017

13.2K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.1K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.1K
Method to Visualize and Analyze Membrane Interacting Proteins by Transmission Electron Microscopy
10:49

Method to Visualize and Analyze Membrane Interacting Proteins by Transmission Electron Microscopy

Published on: March 5, 2017

13.2K

科学领域:

  • 公共卫生 公共卫生
  • 医疗政策 医疗政策
  • 证据综合 证据综合

背景情况:

  • 共识陈述显著影响医疗和公共卫生决策.
  • 一些陈述缺乏系统的证据综合,依靠专家小组和德尔菲流程.
  • 来自小组成员倡导的潜在偏见对共识有效性构成威胁.

研究的目的:

  • 分析共识陈述如何可能具有误导性.
  • 作为一个案例,检查最近的COVID-19 Delphi共识声明.
  • 为共识声明的有效性提出改进建议.

主要方法:

  • 关于COVID-19的高影响力德尔菲共识声明的深入分析.
  • 识别和评估小组成员的倡导和潜在的利益冲突.
  • 声明冲突与实际倡导立场的评估.

主要成果:

  • 许多精选的小组成员,包括核心小组的35%,主张消除COVID-19 (Zero-COVID).
  • 这些成员是侵略性倡导团体的领导人,他们的冲突在很大程度上是未经声明的.
  • 案例示例表明,由于未申报的倡导,存在重大偏见.

结论:

  • 达成共识的声明需要严格的证据综合才能有效.
  • 对于潜在的偏见,包括宣传和游说,最大程度的透明度至关重要.
  • 必须避免倡导团体对共识小组的偏见影响.