干预措施及其在支持0-3岁早产儿语言发展方面的有效性 - - 一项系统性审查
Anna Markkula1, Riikka Pyhälä-Neuvonen1, Suvi Stolt1
1Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Early human development
|June 20, 2024
概括
早期语言干预措施对早产儿,特别是第二年和第三年的孩子来说是有前途的. 需要更多的研究才能充分了解这些关键的早期支持的有效性.
科学领域:
- 儿科 儿科 儿科
- 发展心理学 发展心理学
- 语音语言病理学 语言病理学
背景情况:
- 与满期婴儿相比,早产婴儿面临语言延迟的风险更高.
- 早期的语言干预在早产人口中未得到充分利用.
- 关于早期语言干预对早产儿的疗效的数据有限.
研究的目的:
- 系统地审查针对早产儿 (0-3岁) 的干预措施,重点关注语言结果.
- 评估识别的语言干预措施的有效性和报告质量.
- 确定支持早产婴儿语言发展的有效策略.
主要方法:
- 在六个主要的学术数据库中进行了系统的文献搜索.
- 对于语言结果,计算了效果大小 (Hedges' g).
- 研究报告的质量是使用美国语音语言听力协会的证据水平系统来评估的.
主要成果:
- 28项研究被分为三个干预组:新生儿重症监护室 (NICU),第一年和第二/第三年.
- 61%的干预措施在改善语言发展方面表现出有效性.
- 在第二年和/或第三年进行的干预显示出最高的疗效率 (80%).
结论:
- 现有的研究为早产儿早期语言干预措施的有效性提供了有限的证据.
- 在第二年和第三年实施的干预措施对增强语言发展特别有希望.
- 建议进行进一步的研究,包括以语言为重点的干预措施,并延长后续期.
更多相关视频
10:11Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
Published on: December 14, 2012
18.5K
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
3.7K
相关概念视频
Language Development
341
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
341
Language and Cognition
342
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
342
