在公共政策的共同生产研究人员的反射性的价值:一个实际的视角
Yamini Cinamon Nair1, Mark Fabian2
1Greater London Authority, London, UK.
The Journal of medical humanities
|June 23, 2024
概括
研究人员的反射性通过改善伦理和认识结果来增强公共政策的共同生产. 反思偏见会破坏权力动态,使政策民主化,赋予公民权力.
科学领域:
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
- 公共政策 公共政策
- 研究伦理学研究伦理学
背景情况:
- 公共政策的联合生产将各种各样的利益相关者聚集在一起,共同制定政策.
- 它旨在通过整合各种知识和观点来增强政策的合法性和有效性.
- 研究人员的反射性被认为是共同生产中伦理和认识学方面的必不可少的收益.
研究的目的:
- 论证研究人员反射能力在最大限度地发挥政策共同生产的好处方面的关键作用.
- 探索反射性如何破坏研究和决策中的权力动态.
- 通过共同生产经济困难中壮成长理论的案例研究来证明反射性的价值.
主要方法:
- 该研究倡导对研究人员的立场,习惯和偏见进行批判性自我反思.
- 它涉及分析这些因素如何影响研究设计,数据流程和研究结果.
- 使用案例研究方法,分析与英国慈善机构Turn2us.
主要成果:
- 反射性为研究过程和结果提供了新的见解.
- 它有助于挑战和破坏研究和政策中固有的权力不平衡.
- 反射性实践支持政策制定的民主化,并赋予公民权力.
结论:
- 研究人员的反射性对于道德和认识论上健全的共同生产至关重要.
- 它释放了共同生产的潜力,创造了更关系和公平的研究和政策.
- 在英国当前的政策共同生产环境中,倡导反射性至关重要.
更多相关视频
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
3.7K
08:53Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
5.1K
相关概念视频
Ethics in Research
23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
Bias
4.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.2K
Archival Research
16.0K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
16.0K
Naturalistic Observations
15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
49.9K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
49.9K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
238
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
238
