在基于社区的参与性研究中,权力差异的质疑,谈判和颠覆:一个范围审查
概括
基于社区的参与型研究 (CBPR) 伙伴关系经常与权力动态作斗争. 虽然研究人员确定了个人的偏见,但解决机构权力不平衡需要进一步关注公平的合作.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
- 社区参与 社区参与
背景情况:
- 基于社区的参与式研究 (CBPR) 和参与式行动研究 (PAR) 越来越多地被用于促进健康.
- 了解和解决这些伙伴关系中的权力差异对于公平合作至关重要.
- 现有的文献已经探索了研究伙伴关系中的权力动态的各个方面.
研究的目的:
- 对实证,同行评审的关于CBPR和PAR伙伴关系中的权力动态的文章进行范围审查.
- 检查这些研究合作中权力差异是如何被质疑,谈判和纠正的.
- 综合关于在探索电力问题时使用定性方法学的发现.
主要方法:
- 根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的框架和PRISMA指导方针进行了系统范围审查.
- 在Embase,ERIC,PsycINFO,PubMed和Web of Science数据库中进行了搜索.
- 包含的文章是在2010-2020年间以英语出版的,重点是CBPR/PAR和功率差异.
主要成果:
- 学者们主要使用批判性,反射性的定性方法来识别个人偏见和等级权力.
- 对制度和相互依存的权力动态的分析在审查的文献中是有限的.
- 虽然报告了管理紧张局势的个人行动,但制定制度变革的努力很少.
结论:
- 建立公平的CBPR/PAR合作是一个持续的挑战.
- 解决权力问题需要对制度和结构因素进行更深入的研究.
- 这次审查的见解可以为健康促进倡议和政策制定的专业人士提供信息.
更多相关视频
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
3.7K
08:10Neuroimaging Field Methods Using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy NIRS Neuroimaging to Study Global Child Development: Rural Sub-Saharan Africa
Published on: February 2, 2018
14.9K
相关概念视频
Community Based Intervention
38
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
38
Relationship Formation
40.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.0K
Ethics in Research
23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Archival Research
16.0K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
16.0K
The Scientific Method
59.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.3K
