相关实验视频
Updated: Jun 22, 2025

12:10
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
Published on: March 4, 2022
2.6K
不熟练和不知情:二级判断的增加与低表现者的错误校准
Mariana Veiga Chetto Coutinho1, Justin Thomas2, Imani Fredricks-Lowman3
1Department of Cognitive Sciences, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Frontiers in psychology
|July 2, 2024
概括
低绩效的人往往高估了自己的能力,因为他们没有意识到自己的表现不佳. 这项研究发现,较不准确的自我估计与低绩效者对准确度的更高信心相关.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 教育心理学教育心理学
背景情况:
- 绩效评估中的高估和错误校准与参与者的知识和技能下降有关.
- 认为表现良好的能力与准确自我评估的能力相关,这表明缺乏知识会导致表现不佳和对缺陷的不意识.
研究的目的:
- 调查不同绩效水平的学生在自我评价中识别偏见的程度.
- 为了澄清表现,自我估计准确度 (错误校准) 和对这些估计的信心 (二级判断) 之间的关系.
主要方法:
- 调查了653名大学生,他们对考试成绩的估计和对这些估计的信心 (二级判断).
- 在性能四分位数中分析了校准错误和二次判断之间的关系.
主要成果:
- 在高绩效的高绩效者中,错误校准和二级判断之间发现了负面关系.
- 对表现较低的人来说,观察到一种积极的关系:更大的校准错误与对自我评价的更高信心有关.
- 研究结果表明,对知识差距的认识取决于知识本身的水平.
结论:
- 低表现者的过度自信可能源于无法识别自己的错误,支持知识意识假设.
- 超认知判断,特别是二次判断,在各个表现谱中显示出不同程度的自我意识.
相关概念视频
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
73.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
73.6K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Random and Systematic Errors
10.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.9K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
71
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
71
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
2.4K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.4K
Regression Toward the Mean
6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K

