经典真理逻辑的实验研究多命题一致和不相容:双过程理论和 modal 推理的推理
Salma Waheed1, Abdul Waheed2, Sana Habib3
1School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
PloS one
|July 2, 2024
概括
这项关于多命题的研究发现,个人更喜欢可能的一致性/不兼容性 (PC/PI) 而不是必要的一致性 (NC). 学生们更赞同PC而不是NC,更赞同PI而不是不可能不兼容 (IPI).
科学领域:
- 认知科学 认知科学
- 逻辑 逻辑 逻辑 逻辑
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
背景情况:
- 经典的真理逻辑传统上检查命题.
- 双流程理论 (DPT) 和 modal syllogistic 提供了多命题推理的框架.
- 现有的模型缺乏以逻辑一致性和不兼容性为基础的alethic模式的整合.
研究的目的:
- 调查个人如何评估涉及灵性模式,逻辑一致性和不兼容性的多命题.
- 测试关于可能一致性/不兼容性 (PC/PI) 与必要一致性 (NC) 的认可的假设.
- 探索工作记忆和智力对多命题判断的影响.
主要方法:
- 开发一种新的框架,将alethic模式 (必要的一致性,可能的一致性/不兼容性,不可能的不兼容性) 与逻辑的一致性和不兼容性相结合.
- 使用四个量化器 (所有,没有,一些,一些不是) 和三个命题模式来构建多个命题.
- 在单思维和多思维模型实验中使用即时推断,评估和生产任务.
主要成果:
- 个人主要支持可能的一致性/不兼容性 (PC/PI) 推断,而不是必要的一致性 (NC) 推断.
- 当PC/PI被分开时,PC被认可多于NC,PI被认可多于不可能不兼容 (IPI).
- 在必要的一致性地判断多命题时,特定的逻辑谬误始终被抵制或认可.
结论:
- 学生对多个命题的判断与优先考虑可能而不是必要的一致性相一致.
- 工作记忆和智力的个体差异可能会影响多重命题的认可.
- 该研究提供了对人类推理的见解,使用模态逻辑和逻辑谬误.
相关概念视频
Deductive Reasoning
55.2K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
55.2K
Inductive Reasoning
60.4K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.4K
Reason and Intuition
6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
The Scientific Method
59.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.3K
Cognitive Learning
237
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
237
Structuralism
621
Structuralism, an early psychological theory developed by Wilhelm Wundt and his student Edward Bradford Titchener, sought to dissect the human mind into its most fundamental components. Wundt's groundbreaking work in his laboratory set the stage for Titchener to define structuralism's goal as cataloging the "atoms" of the mind—sensations, images, and feelings—akin to how chemists identify elements of matter.
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He...
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He...
621


