在上向下论点上,对于有能力做其他事情的能力
1Department of Philosophy (GW), Salzburg University, Kapitelgasse 4-6, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
概括
自由意志的上下论证表明人类可以做别的事情,但这篇论文认为这不够. 它未能证明这种能力与自由意志辩论有关,即使与科学理论有关.
科学领域:
- 思想的哲学 思想的哲学
- 形而上学的形而上学.
- 神经科学是一个神经科学.
背景情况:
- "做不同的事情的能力"的概念是自由意志讨论的核心.
- 上下论试图利用科学理论来建立这种能力.
- 现有的论点可能无法充分弥合科学发现和对自由意志的哲学要求之间的差距.
研究的目的:
- 批判性地评估"自上而下的论点"的能力,以否则的方式去做.
- 要确定论点是否成功地建立了与自由意志相关的"有能力做其他事情"的意义.
- 探索科学理论在支持自由主义自由意志方面的局限性.
主要方法:
- 对"自上而下的论点"的前提和结论进行概念分析.
- 检查人类行动的科学理论及其对代理的含义.
- 在自由意志辩论中对论点的有效性和健全性的逻辑评估.
主要成果:
- 上下论证成功地证明了人类可以在某种意义上做别的事情.
- 然而,这一论点未能证明这种能力是自由意志所需的具体类型.
- 试图通过改进其场所来加强论点的尝试被发现没有成功.
结论:
- 呈现的自上而下的论点,不足以证明与自由意志相关的其他能力.
- 当前的科学理论虽然假定了某种形式的替代可能性,但可能无法满足自由意志的严格要求.
- 需要进一步的哲学和科学研究来调和能力做别的自由意志.
相关概念视频
Reason and Intuition
6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Attribution Theory
12.9K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
12.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality
318
Behaviorists view personality as primarily shaped by environmental reinforcements and consequences. According to this perspective, behavior is influenced by external stimuli, and individuals adjust their actions based on rewards and punishments. Over time, learning histories — accumulated patterns of reinforcement — play a significant role in shaping personality. Behaviors that lead to positive outcomes are reinforced, while those resulting in negative outcomes are diminished.
318
Inductive Reasoning
60.4K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.4K


