公众对的人的明确和隐含认知过程
Elise L Rickert1, Heather D Salvo1, Jennifer Roche1
1Kent State University, Center for Performing Arts A122, 1325 Theatre Drive, Kent, OH 44242, USA.
Journal of fluency disorders
|July 6, 2024
概括
这项研究使用鼠标追踪来分析公众对口吃的态度. 虽然明确的反应大多是准确的,但隐性测量显示了认知冲突,这表明人们倾向于同意关于口吃的陈述.
科学领域:
- 语音和语言病理学 语言病理学
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 人与计算机的交互
背景情况:
- 人类属性 - 吃 (POSHA-S) 的公众论调查衡量了公众对吃的人的态度.
- 社会可取性偏见可能会影响调查答案的有效性.
- 了解社会判断背后的认知过程至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 通过使用计算机鼠标跟踪来调查影响的人的社会判断的认知过程.
- 通过分析鼠标运动数据来评估隐含的认知过程.
- 评估对POSHA-S.S.的反应中的潜在社会可取性偏见.
主要方法:
- 参与者 (22名女性,1名非二进制,47名男性) 通过计算机鼠标跟踪完成了经过修改的在线POSHA-S.
- 明确的认知过程通过将反应分类为正确/有帮助或不正确/没有帮助来衡量.
- 隐性认知过程通过小鼠轨迹指标 (曲线下的面积 - AUC,反应时间 - RT) 进行评估.
主要成果:
- 参与者的明确答案主要是正确/有帮助的 (77%),但错误/没有帮助的提示被认可了52%的时间.
- 熟悉口吃的人与不同意不正确/无助的陈述相关.
- 鼠标追踪显示,当参与者回答"不同意"而不是"同意"时,认知竞争更大 (AUC更高,RT更长).
结论:
- 对POSHA-S的明确反应表明了普遍积极的态度,但隐性措施表明了潜在的认知冲突和同意的倾向.
- 研究结果强调了测量对口吃的态度的复杂性,可能会产生社会可取性偏见.
- 需要进一步的研究来完善测量和改进口相关的显式和隐式认知过程的方法.
更多相关视频
07:18Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
Published on: January 26, 2024
869
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
5.7K
相关概念视频
01:04Social Facilitation
31.9K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
31.9K
01:38Cognitive Dissonance
32.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.6K
02:55Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.1K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.1K
01:25Beck's Cognitive Therapy
45
Cognitive therapy is a psychological approach designed to address distortions in thinking, which can lead to negative emotions and unrealistic beliefs. These cognitive distortions often influence how individuals interpret and respond to situations, exacerbating emotional distress. Below are some prevalent cognitive distortions, their characteristics, and examples of how they manifest in thought processes.
Arbitrary Inference
Arbitrary inference involves making conclusions without sufficient...
Arbitrary Inference
Arbitrary inference involves making conclusions without sufficient...
45
02:09Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
37.6K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.6K
01:27Language and Cognition
340
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
340