在搜索中分散注意力的相似性和类别可变性效应
Arryn Robbins1, Anatolii Evdokimov2
1Department of Psychology, University of Richmond, 114 UR Drive, Rm 113, Richmond, VA, 27303, USA. arobbins@richmond.edu.
Attention, perception & psychophysics
|July 9, 2024
概括
类别的变化对搜索速度的影响不同,取决于分心因素与目标的相似程度. 低可变性有助于注意力,但当分散注意力的因素非常相似时,会阻碍目标验证.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 视觉搜索研究 视觉搜索研究
背景情况:
- 分类搜索依赖于内存,并受到目标/干扰器相似性和类别变异性的影响.
- 这些因素之间的相互作用及其对搜索子进程的影响尚未完全理解.
研究的目的:
- 调查目标/干扰器相似性和类别变异性的相互作用如何影响分类搜索过程.
- 区分这些因素对注意力指导和目标验证的影响.
主要方法:
- 使用多维缩放来操纵目标/干扰器相似性.
- 测量了目标类别的类别变化.
- 收集了眼睛跟踪数据,以分析注意力指导和目标验证.
主要成果:
- 类别变异对响应时间的影响取决于目标/干扰器相似性.
- 低类别的变化导致更长的响应时间,只有当干扰因素与目标非常相似时.
- 这种效应在目标验证中被观察到,但在注意力指导中没有.
结论:
- 注意力更有效地引导到低变量的类别,无论目标/干扰器的相似性如何.
- 低类别的变化阻碍了目标验证,当分心因素与目标类别非常相似时.
- 低类别变量的好处在类别搜索的所有阶段并不均.
更多相关视频
12:12Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
Published on: May 14, 2014
10.6K
07:34Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
17.3K
相关概念视频
Factorial Design
13.0K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.0K
Self-Discrepancy Theory
18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
18.3K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
