Jove
Visualize
联系我们

相关概念视频

Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

11.2K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.2K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

An exploratory study of circulating cell-free mRNAs across colorectal cancer stages.

iScience·2026
Same author

Bridging the Communication Gap: Pragmatics and Interactional Dynamics in Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

<i>GeSTICS</i>: A Multimodal Corpus for Studying Gesture Synthesis in Two-party Interactions with Contextualized Speech.

Proceedings of the ... ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. IVA (Conference)·2025
Same author

On the influence of discourse connectives on the predictions of humans and language models.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2024
Same author

A neuro-cognitive model of comprehension based on prediction and unification.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2024
Same author

Neural Generative Models and the Parallel Architecture of Language: A Critical Review and Outlook.

Topics in cognitive science·2024
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 21, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

689

你的反是如何被理解的? 一个实验研究预期和延迟的对话反.

Auriane Boudin1,2,3, Stéphane Rauzy1,3, Roxane Bertrand1,3

  • 1Aix Marseille Univ, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire Parole et Langage, Aix-en-Provence, France.

JASA express letters
|July 10, 2024
PubMed
概括

反时间会影响听众的参与度,延迟超过1秒会减少. 然而,反的可接受性仍然很高,即使会话的时间发生了重大变化.

更多相关视频

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

33.9K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

689
Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

33.9K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.4K

科学领域:

  • 心理语言学 心理语言学
  • 人与计算机的交互
  • 对话分析 对话分析

背景情况:

  • 了解对话反的细微差别对于有效的人际交互至关重要.
  • 听众反的时间显著影响其被感知的自然性和可接受性.

研究的目的:

  • 调查如何操纵反时间 (预期和延迟) 影响其可接受性和感知到的听众参与.
  • 确定在自发对话中接受和吸引反的时间门.

主要方法:

  • 从自发对话中提取对话序列.
  • 操纵听众反时间,提前1.5秒或延迟2秒.
  • 收集了参与者对反接受度和听众参与度的评分.

主要成果:

  • 在76%的操纵实例中,无论时间如何,反仍然是可以接受的.
  • 当反延迟超过1秒时,听众参与度显著下降.
  • 没有观察到反预期对接受度或参与度产生一致的影响.

结论:

  • 虽然反在很大程度上是可以接受的,但它的时间对于保持听众参与度至关重要.
  • 延迟反,特别是超过1秒,会对对话动态产生负面影响.
  • 预期的反似乎不会影响测试范围内的感知,这表明不同的处理机制.