脊髓内固定与距离支柱骨折的板固定:一个系统的审查
Zachariah Samuel1, Ian S Hong, Marisa Deliso
1From the Division of Orthopaedic Trauma & Adult Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center/Jersey City Medical Center, RWJBarnabas Health Livingston/Jersey City, NJ.
概括
骨骨折的骨髓内钉 (IMN) 显示出类似的结合率,但与板固定 (ORIF) 相比,并发症明显减少. IMN可能会减少伤口并发症,尽管初始成本较高,但可能会带来长期益处.
科学领域:
- 整形外科手术 整形外科手术
- 创伤学 创伤学 创伤学
- 基于证据的医学是基于证据的医学.
背景情况:
- 系统性审查和元分析比较内钉 (IMN) 与外科手术治疗骨骨折的开放缩减和内部板固定 (ORIF).
- 专注于最近的文献来更新临床结果,结合率,并发症率和患者报告的结果.
结论:
- 内钉显示出明显较低的并发症风险,特别是与伤口相关的,与远端骨骨折的板固定相比.
- 虽然IMN在减少并发症方面显示出有希望的结果,但其广泛采用受到植入成本的阻碍.
- 需要进一步的研究和成本效益分析,以充分评估IMN的长期收益和经济可行性.
更多相关视频
05:45Author Spotlight: Exploring Regeneration in Axolotls Through Insights in Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms, Bone Healing, and Implications for Human Therapies
Published on: April 12, 2024
574
15:11Surgical Fixation of Sternal Fractures: Preoperative Planning and a Safe Surgical Technique Using Locked Titanium Plates and Depth Limited Drilling
Published on: January 5, 2015
63.5K
