一个土著知情的范围审查研究方法:推进范围审查的科学
Wanda Phillips-Beck1, Bryden L J Bukich2, Kellie Thiessen3
1First Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba (FNHSSM), Winnipeg, Canada. wphillips-beck@fnhssm.com.
Systematic reviews
|July 15, 2024
概括
这项研究将土著研究方法纳入范围审查中,强调土著声音和社区参与. 这种方法确保了土著人民和学术界的文化相关和可信的健康研究.
科学领域:
- 卫生研究 卫生研究 卫生研究
- 土著研究土著研究.
- 研究方法研究方法研究方法学
背景情况:
- 由于殖民学术结构,在卫生研究中历史上被边缘化了土著人的声音.
- 在健康研究中,土著方法的认可和采用越来越多.
- 需要以土著观点和积极参与为中心的框架.
研究的目的:
- 通过使用土著研究方法来调整阿克西和奥马利的范围审查框架.
- 为开展积极涉及土著人民的健康研究提供一个模型.
- 增强研究成果的可信性和可用性,为土著社区提供帮助.
主要方法:
- 利用了由土著知识守护者和盟友学者组成的咨询圈子指导的范围审查.
- 综合本土和西方研究方法,遵守PRISMA-ScR文献搜索指南.
- 在范围审查协议中采用有机开发过程,而不是预先注册以允许新出现的设计.
主要成果:
- 开发了一个8个阶段的范围审查模型,扩展了阿克西和奥马利的5个阶段.
- 关键阶段包括:探索和倾听,做基础工作,识别和完善研究问题,识别相关研究,研究选择,映射数据,整理,总结和合成数据,共享和创造意义.
- 在整个过程中嵌入式参与和倾听,在初始和最终阶段更加专注.
结论:
- 一个土著的方法进行范围审查需要多元化的团队,在土著和西方的方法的专业知识.
- 有意义的土著代表和土著观点的纳入对于分析和展示研究结果至关重要.
- 在整个研究过程中,让土著人民参与,优先倾听和纳入他们的声音,对于和解和生产可信,可用的研究至关重要.
更多相关视频
08:10Neuroimaging Field Methods Using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy NIRS Neuroimaging to Study Global Child Development: Rural Sub-Saharan Africa
Published on: February 2, 2018
14.9K
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
2.2K
相关概念视频
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
125
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
125
Ethics in Research
23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
Naturalistic Observations
15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K
