Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

190
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
190
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.4K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.4K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.4K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

90.1K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.1K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.6K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Baseline neurochemical excitability and individual differences in motor learning and non-invasive brain stimulation outcomes.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Fragile memories for fleeting percepts.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same author

Breakthrough percepts of familiar faces.

Brain informatics·2026
Same author

Post-error slowing and individual differences in metacognition.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Neurochemical Correlates of Mind-Wandering and Meta-Awareness.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Reframing the Expected Free Energy: Four Formulations and a Unification.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K

在注意力,执行功能和隐式学习方面的效果大小估计中的量化错误.

Kelly G Garner1, Christopher R Nolan2, Abbey Nydam3

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Birmingham.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
|July 18, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

在心理学研究中,小样本大小导致不准确的效果大小估计,可能会使信息丢失增加一倍. 根据先前对小N的研究进行功率计算是不可靠的,这凸显了需要更大的样本的需要.

更多相关视频

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.0K
Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD
10:02

Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD

Published on: March 12, 2020

15.7K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.0K
Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD
10:02

Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD

Published on: March 12, 2020

15.7K

科学领域:

  • 认知心理学 认知心理学
  • 心理学研究方法论心理学研究方法论

背景情况:

  • 准确的效果大小量化对于科学进步和有效的资源分配至关重要.
  • 出版偏差和小样本大小 (N≈25) 损害了当前影响大小估计的可靠性.

研究的目的:

  • 评估样本大小如何影响影响大小估计错误的注意力,执行功能和隐性学习范式.
  • 根据现有的效果大小估计,评估功率计算的可靠性.

主要方法:

  • 一个大数据集与引导相结合,模拟了1000个实验,跨越了各种样本大小 (N=13-313).
  • 分析的重点是量化效应大小,统计能力和信息丢失.
  • 该研究检查了功率计算的精度,并确定了错误估计的预测因素.

主要成果:

  • 使用较小样本大小 (下N) 的实验可能会导致信息丢失的两倍或三倍.
  • 基于类似研究中的效果大小的功率计算,在常见样本大小的情况下,不准确的时间为40%-67%.
  • 对主体间行为效应的倾斜性成为错误效应大小估计的预测因素.

结论:

  • 小样本大小显著增加了不准确的效果大小估计和不可靠的功率计算的风险.
  • 建议研究人员考虑更大的样本大小和效果大小估计变量的潜在影响.
  • 模拟方法提供了有价值的理论见解,包括从否定零假设中获得的信息和个人变化的估计误差中的作用.