表面线索解释了断层中的逻辑喜欢效应
Constantin G Meyer-Grant1, Dorothea Poggel1, Karl Christoph Klauer1
1Department of Psychology, University of Freiburg.
Cognitive science
|July 18, 2024
概括
人们更喜欢逻辑上有效的论点,因为大气启发学,而不仅仅是逻辑直觉. 在断层的断层论中,这种效应受到模仿逻辑有效性的表面特征的影响.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 人类的推理.
- 决策 决策 决策 决策
背景情况:
- 逻辑喜欢效应传统上表明先天的逻辑直觉.
- 最近的研究表明,大气层的表面特征混了这一效应.
- 在推理中大气效应的确切性质仍然不清楚.
研究的目的:
- 为了研究大气效应在断绝性语法中的作用.
- 为了消除逻辑有效性,结论可能性和表面特征的大气.
- 了解逻辑效应的潜在机制.
主要方法:
- 开发了新的分离性语法,以隔离有效性和氛围.
- 进行了三项实验,参与者对论证的可喜和逻辑进行了评分.
- 分析了评级,以区分逻辑有效性和表面特征影响.
主要成果:
- 断层的逻辑效应效应是由大气混和隐含的需求特征解释的.
- 在逻辑评级中观察到显著的气氛效应,独立于有效性.
- 大气效应是由生态上有效的,尽管是错误的,预测逻辑性的表面特征驱动的.
结论:
- 获得的氛围启发函数作为逻辑有效性的代理,经常被不批判地接受.
- 这些启发式被采用不管论点的复杂性,类似于其他类型的修辞论.
- 这些发现挑战了纯逻辑直觉的概念,强调了启发式处理在推理中的作用.
更多相关视频
07:36Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
15.7K
06:07Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm
Published on: May 15, 2019
8.4K
相关概念视频
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Inductive Reasoning
60.3K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.3K
Deductive Reasoning
55.2K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
55.2K
The Availability Heuristic
5.9K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
5.9K
Self-Discrepancy Theory
18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
18.3K
