Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

34.7K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.7K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

142
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
142
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

125
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
125
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

AI-assisted teams outperform AI-led teams but not human-only teams in assessing research reproducibility in quantitative social science.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Structural complexity of brain regions in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same author

Science of Learning Strategy Series: Article 8, Managing Cognitive Load to Maximize Learning.

The Journal of continuing education in the health professions·2026
Same author

A novel mycelial pellet-biochar composite carrier designed for enhancing metabolic and physiological activity of methanogenic microbial consortium under propionate stress.

Bioresource technology·2026
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Cross-linguistic differences in incremental planning under uncertainty.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Sensory attenuation scales with the strength of action-outcome coupling: A psychophysical study.

Cognition·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.1K

冒险的努力是有风险的.

Alice Mason1, Yongming Sun2, Nick Simonsen3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Bath, UK.

Cognition
|July 21, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

人民的人民的人民.

关键词:
根据描述做出决定.一个努力的努力.这是一个四重模式.有风险的选择.

更多相关视频

A Rapidly Incremented Tethered-Swimming Maximal Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Assessment of Swimmers
09:24

A Rapidly Incremented Tethered-Swimming Maximal Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Assessment of Swimmers

Published on: January 28, 2020

8.8K
A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
07:19

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance

Published on: March 19, 2020

5.9K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.1K
A Rapidly Incremented Tethered-Swimming Maximal Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Assessment of Swimmers
09:24

A Rapidly Incremented Tethered-Swimming Maximal Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Assessment of Swimmers

Published on: January 28, 2020

8.8K
A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
07:19

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance

Published on: March 19, 2020

5.9K

科学领域:

  • 认知心理学 认知心理学
  • 决策科学科学 决策科学
  • 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.

背景情况:

  • 决策研究传统上研究风险回报或努力回报的权衡.
  • 人们对努力水平中的风险如何影响选择和风险偏好的理解有限.
  • 努力是许多现实世界的决策的关键因素,但它的风险属性是研究不足的.

研究的目的:

  • 调查与努力相关的风险如何影响决策和风险偏好.
  • 检查大小和概率变化对基于努力的风险态度的影响.
  • 了解个人如何感知和重视选择中的努力的异质性.

主要方法:

  • 两个实验评估了参与者的风险态度,特别是基于努力的决策.
  • 一个控制实验利用货币博与基于努力的选择进行比较.
  • 分析的重点是,大小和概率如何影响涉及努力的冒险行为.

主要成果:

  • 个人对努力的估值与风险偏好的不同模式相关.
  • 与货币决策不同,基于努力的风险偏好在参与者之间显示出显著的异质性.
  • 在那些将努力视为代价高昂的人群中,观察到风险偏好的"反转"相互作用模式.

结论:

  • 将努力视为资源损失的看法显著塑造了对努力的风险偏好.
  • 大多数人将努力视为损失,从而增加了冒险,以避免付出太多的努力.
  • 了解基于努力的风险偏好对于全面的决策模式至关重要,特别是当努力被视为成本时.