Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

202
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
202
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

220
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
220
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

11.3K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.3K
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

344
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
344
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

6.6K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
6.6K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

2.9K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
2.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Towards use of Patient-informed Relevant Outcomes (PRO) in trials of bloodstream infections: a mixed-methods study protocol (BALANCE+PRO).

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Pre-discharge neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio and lymphopenia are associated with post-hospital long-term outcomes among survivors of critical illness.

Intensive care medicine experimental·2026
Same author

Mass cytometry reveals complex neutrophil heterogeneity in patients with severe sepsis.

Intensive care medicine experimental·2026
Same author

Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis in Pediatric Critical Care.

Critical care explorations·2026
Same author

Patient and family experiences of sedation in an urban academic tertiary-level intensive care unit in Canada: a qualitative study.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Corticosteroids for <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> community-acquired pneumonia: promising evidence from a randomised controlled trial.

The Lancet regional health. Europe·2026
Same journal

Cohort profile: Sheyang Mini Birth Cohort Study (SMBCS).

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Quebec lung, liver and heart transplant recipients' perspectives on self-narratives and their experiences in creative writing workshops during the transplantation journey: a qualitative study.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Impact of climatic variables on postoperative outcomes in various surgical disciplines: a systematic review.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

ADHD and cardiometabolic risk profile in adults with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal register-based study.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Understanding the impact of the follow-up period on the association between excess body weight, and cardiovascular events and mortality: a prospective cohort study of the UK Biobank.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Temporal associations between incident physical health problems/sensory impairments and challenging behaviours in people with intellectual disabilities: a population-based longitudinal cohort study of primary care in England.

BMJ open·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 19, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

在ICU试验中的核心社会人口统计数据变量 (CoDe-IT):使用Delphi共识过程生成核心数据变量的协议.

Karla D Krewulak1, Fatima Sheikh2, Alya Heirali1

  • 1Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

BMJ open
|July 23, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

社会人口统计学因素显著影响严重病情严重的成年人.

关键词:
临床试验是指临床试验中的临床试验.密集治疗和重症监护统计与研究方法 统计与研究方法

更多相关视频

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.7K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.7K

科学领域:

  • 关键护理医学 关键护理医学
  • 医疗服务研究 医疗服务研究
  • 健康的社会决定因素

背景情况:

  • 社会人口统计学变量,如性别认同和民族种族群体,直接和间接地影响严重疾病成年人的健康结果.
  • 在重症监护研究中,对这些变量进行不一致和不足的数据收集阻碍了有效的护理和研究设计.
  • 在重症监护研究中,公认需要标准化的社会人口统计测量.

研究的目的:

  • 为健康的社会决定因素开发一套核心数据变量 (CoDaV),以适应涉及重病成年人的研究.
  • 建立关于改善重症监护研究数据收集的基本社会人口统计措施的共识.
  • 通过提供标准化数据收集建议,指导未来的研究和临床实践.

主要方法:

  • 范围审查将确定在修改后的Delphi过程中包含的潜在社会人口统计指标.
  • 包括患者,家庭,临床医生和研究人员在内的知识用户将参加共识调查.
  • 最后一次会议将完善CoDaV,确定数据收集的细节性,并计划传播.

主要成果:

  • 这项研究旨在为关键护理研究生成基于共识的核心社会人口统计变量列表.
  • 通过专家和利益相关者的意见,将确定具体措施和推的数据收集方法.
  • 开发的CoDaV将解决目前在重症监护中标准化社会人口统计数据的缺口.

结论:

  • 拟议的核心数据变量 (CoDaV) 将在重症监护研究中标准化社会人口统计信息的收集.
  • 实施CoDaV将提高对重症成人健康结果的研究质量和可比性.
  • 这一倡议将改善对重症监护机构健康的社会决定因素的理解和处理.