教师的判断准确性:通过心理测量元分析进行复制检查.
1Research Methods, Assessment and iScience, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
PloS one
|July 25, 2024
概括
教师 教师 教师的教师
科学领域:
- 教育心理学教育心理学
- 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
背景情况:
- 教师的判断准确性对于学生的评估至关重要.
- 之前的元分析估计了教师在判断学生学业成绩的准确性.
- 准确的判断依赖于将教师的感知与学生的考试成绩相关联.
研究的目的:
- 更新和重新分析现有的关于教师判断准确性的元分析.
- 通过心理测量元分析,调查以往发现的差异来源.
- 突出现有研究的方法限制,并提出改进建议.
主要方法:
- 在教师判断准确性研究的更新数据库上进行了心理测量元分析.
- 分析并纠正诸如采样错误和测量错误等缺陷.
- 评估聚合和出版偏差对研究结果的影响.
主要成果:
- 之前的审查低估了教师的判断准确性.
- 对准确度估计差异的高估与未经纠正的文物 (至少10%) 有关.
- 许多研究缺乏足够的数据来进行严格的元分析.
结论:
- 经典的元分析可以错误地将差异归因于调节者而不是文物.
- 心理测量元分析提供了一个更准确的合成教师的判断准确性.
- 需要在线数据库和标准化报告来提高可复制性和科学严谨性.
更多相关视频
12:55Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
8.4K
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
3.9K
相关概念视频
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
189
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
189
Accuracy and Precision
8.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate...
8.8K
The Representativeness Heuristic
15.8K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
15.8K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
73.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
73.6K
Regression Toward the Mean
6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
