Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

363
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
363
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

264
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
264
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

8.4K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
8.4K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

216
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
216
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

157
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
157
Longitudinal Studies01:26

Longitudinal Studies

151
Longitudinal studies are also widely used in other medical and social science fields. For instance, in cardiovascular research, they can monitor patients' health over decades to identify risk factors for heart disease, such as high cholesterol or smoking, and evaluate the long-term effectiveness of preventive measures. Similarly, in mental health studies, researchers might follow individuals from adolescence into adulthood to understand the development and progression of conditions like...
151

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Outcome-Assisted Multiple Imputation of Missing Treatments.

Observational studies·2026
Same author

Optimal <i>F</i>-score Matching for Bipartite Record Linkage.

Statistics and computing·2026
Same author

Fully Synthetic Data for Complex Surveys.

Survey methodology·2025
Same author

Studying Chinese immigrants' spatial distribution in the Raleigh-Durham area by linking survey and commercial data using romanized names.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society)·2025
Same author

Evaluating Binary Outcome Classifiers Estimated from Survey Data.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2024
Same author

The association between long-term PM2.5 exposure and risk for pancreatic cancer: an application of social informatics.

American journal of epidemiology·2024

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K

用回归辅助的贝叶斯记录对观察性研究中的因果推理的因果推理与共变量分布在两个文件中.

Sharmistha Guha1, Jerome P Reiter2

  • 1Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, TX, USA.

Journal of statistical planning and inference
|July 30, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

本研究引入了一种使用链接观察数据的因果推断的新方法. 它通过解决不完美的数据链接带来的不确定性来提高治疗效果估计的准确性.

关键词:
数据融合数据融合实体解决方案 实体解决方案它们的重叠.倾向性得分的得分是多少?治疗方法 治疗方法

更多相关视频

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.3K
Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
08:27

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

3.6K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.3K
Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
08:27

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

3.6K

科学领域:

  • 统计 统计 统计 统计
  • 计量经济学 计量经济学
  • 流行病学 流行病学

背景情况:

  • 观察性研究通常涉及来自多个来源的数据.
  • 将这些数据集连接起来可以通过包含更多的共变量来减少偏差.
  • 概率记录链接是常见的,但不考虑链接不确定性.

研究的目的:

  • 开发一种因果推理方法,以解释概率记录链接中的不确定性.
  • 在使用来自多个文件的链接观察数据时,提高因果效应估计的准确性.
  • 整合贝叶斯记录链接与因果推理技术.

主要方法:

  • 融合回归辅助,贝叶斯概率记录链接与因果推理.
  • 使用马尔科夫链蒙特卡洛采样器生成多个可信的链接数据集.
  • 应用因果推论估计器,特别是那些基于倾向性得分重叠权重的估计器.

主要成果:

  • 拟议的方法将不确定性从不完美的联系传播到因果推理.
  • 它利用变量关系来提高记录链接质量.
  • 模拟和现实世界数据分析表明,预计治疗效果的准确性有所提高.

结论:

  • 综合方法为因果推理提供了一个更强大的框架,与相关的观测数据联系在一起.
  • 考虑联系不确定性对于可靠的因果效应估计至关重要.
  • 这种方法提高了多来源观测研究的结果的有效性.