Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

10.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.9K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.6K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.4K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

858
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
858
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.5K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.5K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

186
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
186

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Cerebellar perturbation impairs human working memory and degrades spatial tuning throughout cortex.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

PupEyes: An interactive Python library for eye movement data processing.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Striatal Dopamine Actions and Movement: Inferences from Parkinson Disease.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Are abrupt onsets highly salient?

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Dissociable Causal Roles of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Primary Motor Cortex over the Course of Motor Skill Development.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Publisher Correction: Errors of attention adaptively warp spatial cognition.

Nature human behaviour·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K

人们在犯错误后更容易犯错误.

Tyler J Adkins1, Han Zhang1, Taraz G Lee2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Nature communications
|July 30, 2024
PubMed
概括

错误后减速不仅仅是谨慎;错误会损害认知处理,导致更多的错误. 这表明减速是对减少处理效率的适应性反应,而不是速度精度的权衡.

科学领域:

  • 认知心理学 认知心理学
  • 神经科学是一个神经科学.
  • 人类表现的人类表现.

背景情况:

  • 错误后减速是人类表现的一个常见现象.
  • 传统的解释认为这种减速是因为人们更加谨慎.
  • 然而,在错误之后,准确度往往不会提高,这就质疑了谨慎假设.

研究的目的:

  • 调查错误后减速的潜在机制.
  • 要区分战略调整 (谨慎) 和错误后处理损害.
  • 描述错误后认知处理的时间动态.

主要方法:

  • 使用具有受控响应时间的任务来隔离处理阶段.
  • 分析了响应的准确性和延迟.
  • 采用了响应准备的计算模型.

主要成果:

  • 参与者在错误后仍然不那么准确,即使有足够的时间.
  • 一个计算模型排除了认知处理的一般减速.
  • 发现错误会损害认知处理在产生反应中的有效性.
  • 错误后观察到更多的动作滑动,通常是先前错误的重复.

更多相关视频

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

20.8K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.2K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K
Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

20.8K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.2K

结论:

  • 错误后减速可能不仅仅反映了速度-精度权衡的战略转变.
  • 认知处理效率受损,而不是提高谨慎,似乎是后错误性能下降的基础.
  • 这种损害导致速度与精度的关系发生变化,可能是作为一种适应机制.