在0至3岁的儿童中,语言评估尺度Trivandrum (LEST) 的表现中的性别差异
Priyadarshini Ponvannan1, Balaji Chinnasami1, S Vaishali1
1Department of Paediatrics, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, IND.
Cureus
|August 5, 2024
概括
与女孩相比,男孩在语言发展里程碑上表现出显著的延迟. 这项研究表明,对于精确的儿童语言评估,可能需要性别特定的语言评估尺度Trivandrum (LEST) 标准.
科学领域:
- 儿科语言发展指南
- 儿童心理学 儿童心理学
- 发育儿科 发育儿科
背景情况:
- 语言评估尺度Trivandrum (LEST) 广泛用于评估0-3岁儿童的语言发展.
- 目前的LEST标准缺乏性别特定的基准,这可能会影响评估的准确性.
- 调查性别差异对于完善语言评估工具至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 通过使用LEST尺度来检查语言发展中的性别差异.
- 确定是否需要对男孩和女孩进行单独的LEST尺度来进行准确的评估.
- 在实现语言里程碑方面分析基于性别的差异.
主要方法:
- 一项涉及198名0-3岁儿童 (99名男孩,99名女孩) 的横截面研究.
- 父母在提供知情同意后填写了33项LEST规模问卷.
- 数据分析的重点是识别语言发展里程碑中的性别特异性模式.
主要成果:
- 在语言发展方面观察到显著的性别差异.
- 与女孩相比,男孩在获得语言里程碑方面表现出统计学上显著的延迟 (p=0.003).
- 在78名有延迟的儿童中,65.4%是男孩,34.6%是女孩.
结论:
- 男孩和女孩表现出不同的时间表来实现语言里程碑.
- 研究结果表明,可能需要针对性别的LEST尺度来提高评估准确性.
- 建议对更大规模的研究进行进一步验证,以确认这些基于性别的差异.
更多相关视频
08:05Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
Published on: June 30, 2020
7.5K
10:11Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
Published on: December 14, 2012
18.4K
相关概念视频
Language Development
329
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
329
Language and Cognition
340
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
340
