使用确认因素分析评估Charité报警疲劳问卷的构造有效性
Maximilian Markus Wunderlich1, Henning Krampe2, Kristina Fuest3
1Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany, 49 30 450 581018.
JMIR human factors
|August 9, 2024
概括
查理特警报疲劳问卷 (CAFQa) 已被验证用于测量医疗保健专业人员的警报疲劳. 这种工具可靠地评估精神病学影响和应对策略,支持其在临床和研究环境中使用.
科学领域:
- 医疗保健的质量 医疗保健的质量
- 医疗器械技术 医疗器械技术
- 心理测量 心理测量
背景情况:
- 报警疲劳是护士和医生的一个重要问题,影响了患者的护理.
- 需要对报警疲劳进行标准化测量,以解决其影响.
- 查理特警报疲劳问卷 (CAFQa) 是为了测量警报疲劳而开发的.
研究的目的:
- 为了验证CAFQa的假设的两个尺度结构.
- 确认CAFQa用于测量报警疲劳的构造有效性.
- 确定CAFQa在临床环境中的可靠性和适用性.
主要方法:
- 德国进行了两项独立研究,对重症监护室 (ICU) 护士和医生进行了研究.
- 使用未加权最小平方算法进行确认因数分析.
- 通过将问卷调查结果与自我报告的报警疲劳和虚假报警暴露相关联,评估了收的有效性.
主要成果:
- 在这两项研究中,确认因素分析支持了假设的两级结构.
- 好的模型匹配指数 (RMSEA <0.05,SRMR <0.08) 证实了问卷的有效性.
- 在CAFQa得分和自我报告的报警疲劳之间发现了中等的相关性,以及与虚假报警暴露的弱相关性.
结论:
- CAFQa有效地测量了警报疲劳的构造,正如假设的那样.
- 该问卷为研究人员和临床医生提供了一种可靠的工具,以评估护士和医生的警报疲劳.
- CAFQa的验证结构支持其用于标准化报警疲劳测量.
相关概念视频
01:29Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
02:01Factorial Design
13.0K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.0K
01:24Cattell's 16 Personality Factors
572
Raymond Cattell's trait theory offers a structured framework for understanding personality by distinguishing between two critical traits: surface and source traits. Surface traits are observable patterns of behavior, such as indecisiveness, anxiety, and irrational fears. These traits are less stable, varying across situations and over time. This means that they are less helpful in understanding the deeper aspects of an individual's personality.
In contrast, source traits are the...
In contrast, source traits are the...
572
01:22Self-Report Tests of Personality
328
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
328
01:21Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
172
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
172
01:16Goodness-of-Fit Test
3.3K
The goodness-of-fit test is a type of hypothesis test which determines whether the data "fits" a particular distribution. For example, one may suspect that some anonymous data may fit a binomial distribution. A chi-square test (meaning the distribution for the hypothesis test is chi-square) can be used to determine if there is a fit. The null and alternative hypotheses may be written in sentences or stated as equations or inequalities. The test statistic for a goodness-of-fit test is given as...
3.3K