Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Vascular Spasm01:16

Vascular Spasm

1.3K
The vascular phase, also known as vasospasm, is the initial stage of hemostasis, crucial for preventing excessive bleeding when a blood vessel is injured. After a vessel is cut, nerves in the damaged area trigger pain and other sensory impulses. Simultaneously, the smooth muscles in the vessel wall contract, resulting in a vascular spasm. This contraction reduces the vessel's diameter at the injury site, slowing or stopping blood loss through the vessel wall. Vascular spasms typically last...
1.3K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

International survey on the management of cervical artery dissection: assessing consensus and variability in practice.

Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis·2026
Same author

Possible Diagnostic Error in Cervical Artery Dissection: Analysis of STOP-CAD Study.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same author

Characteristics of Unsuccessful Recanalization Following Endovascular Thrombectomy: Cohort Study (EVATRISP Collaboration).

Stroke·2026
Same author

Are there disparities in cerebral sinus venous thrombosis between the Arab and Jewish populations in Israel - a multicenter cohort study?

Journal of the neurological sciences·2026
Same author

Outcomes and Safety of Revascularization Approaches for Stroke Related to Isolated Vertebral Artery Occlusions (BRAVO).

Stroke·2026
Same author

CT perfusion ischemic core predicts PH-2 hemorrhagic transformation following intravenous alteplase bridging treatment prior to endovascular thrombectomy.

Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
10:34

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Published on: August 30, 2020

10.4K

创伤性和自发性宫动脉剖析之间有什么区别?

Issa Metanis1, Naaem Simaan1,2, Yoel Schwartzmann1

  • 1Department of Neurology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel.

Journal of clinical medicine
|August 10, 2024
PubMed
概括

自发性和创伤性宫动脉剖析 (CeAD) 呈现不同,创伤性病例显示出较少的心脏病发作但更多的出血. 然而,剖析亚型并不独立地影响中风后实现功能独立的可能性.

关键词:
解剖 解剖 解剖 解剖结果结果结果结果.一次性中风中风中风中风中风一个创伤的创伤创伤.

更多相关视频

An In Vivo Duo-color Method for Imaging Vascular Dynamics Following Contusive Spinal Cord Injury
09:25

An In Vivo Duo-color Method for Imaging Vascular Dynamics Following Contusive Spinal Cord Injury

Published on: December 31, 2017

9.4K
Creation of Two Saccular Elastase-Digested Aneurysms with Different Hemodynamics in One Rabbit
07:04

Creation of Two Saccular Elastase-Digested Aneurysms with Different Hemodynamics in One Rabbit

Published on: April 15, 2021

2.1K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
10:34

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Published on: August 30, 2020

10.4K
An In Vivo Duo-color Method for Imaging Vascular Dynamics Following Contusive Spinal Cord Injury
09:25

An In Vivo Duo-color Method for Imaging Vascular Dynamics Following Contusive Spinal Cord Injury

Published on: December 31, 2017

9.4K
Creation of Two Saccular Elastase-Digested Aneurysms with Different Hemodynamics in One Rabbit
07:04

Creation of Two Saccular Elastase-Digested Aneurysms with Different Hemodynamics in One Rabbit

Published on: April 15, 2021

2.1K

科学领域:

  • 神经学 神经学
  • 血管医学 血管医学
  • 脑卒中研究 脑卒中研究

背景情况:

  • 宫动脉剖析 (CeAD) 是年轻成年人中风的重要原因.
  • CeAD可以是自发性 (sCeAD) 或创伤性 (tCeAD),具有不同的临床和放射性特征.
  • 了解CeAD亚型之间的差异对于有针对性的治疗和改善患者治疗结果至关重要.

研究的目的:

  • 为了比较自发和创伤性宫动脉剖析之间的临床,放射和结果特征.
  • 确定与CeAD患者有利结局相关的因素.
  • 为了确定剖析亚型是否独立地影响功能恢复.

主要方法:

  • 对154名CeAD患者的回顾性分析,分为sCeAD和tCeAD组.
  • 人口统计数据,临床特征,风险因素,成像发现,治疗和90天结果的比较.
  • 后勤回归分析以确定有利结果的预测因素.

主要成果:

  • 与tCeAD患者相比,sCeAD患者年龄较大,患高脂血症的可能性更高.
  • tCeAD患者在成像上发生的早期心脏病发作较少,但出现的症状较多的内出血.
  • 在tCeAD患者中,90天的良好结果不太常见 (78%对97%).
  • 年龄,中风严重程度,血管狭窄和多血管参与预测了有利的结果,而不是剖析亚型.

结论:

  • 宫动脉剖析亚型 (自发与创伤) 不能独立预测功能独立性.
  • 临床表现和成像发现在sCeAD和tCeAD之间存在显著差异.
  • 诸如最初的中风严重程度和年龄等因素是CeAD患者康复的关键决定因素.