Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Unhealthy fat distribution as a sex-specific predictor of declining hippocampus insulin sensitivity.

Diabetologia·2026
Same author

Mistletoe extract in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: Health-related quality of life in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (MISTRAL).

Palliative medicine·2026
Same author

Post-OGTT hypoglycaemia in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: frequency, characteristics and cluster assignment.

Diabetologia·2026
Same author

The interplay of central insulin and menstrual cycle on functional brain networks and neural food cue reactivity in women.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Hemolysis index. Can we uncritically trust manufacturer declarations?

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2025
Same author

National recommendations of the Croatian society of medical biochemistry and laboratory medicine: Thyroid function tests from the laboratory point of view.

Biochemia medica·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Use of Capillary Electrophoresis Immunoassay to Search for Potential Biomarkers of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Human Platelets
11:03

Use of Capillary Electrophoresis Immunoassay to Search for Potential Biomarkers of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Human Platelets

Published on: February 10, 2020

7.2K

在最大护理医院进行抗脂抗体检测:方法依赖的差异

Marija Kocijancic1, Thomas Goj1, Andreas Peter1,2,3

  • 1Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, Department for Diagnostic Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Journal of clinical medicine
|August 10, 2024
PubMed
概括

对抗脂抗体 (aPL) 测试的酶相关免疫吸收试验 (ELISA) 和化学发光免疫试验 (CLIA) 的比较揭示了依赖方法的显著差异. 仔细解释aPL结果对于准确的抗脂综合征分类至关重要.

关键词:
抗β2糖蛋白I抗体 抗β2糖蛋白I抗体抗体检测试验 抗体检测试验抗心脂蛋白抗体的抗体抗脂综合征是一种抗脂综合征.

更多相关视频

Methods for Quantitative Detection of Antibody-induced Complement Activation on Red Blood Cells
06:29

Methods for Quantitative Detection of Antibody-induced Complement Activation on Red Blood Cells

Published on: January 29, 2014

30.6K
Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

4.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Use of Capillary Electrophoresis Immunoassay to Search for Potential Biomarkers of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Human Platelets
11:03

Use of Capillary Electrophoresis Immunoassay to Search for Potential Biomarkers of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Human Platelets

Published on: February 10, 2020

7.2K
Methods for Quantitative Detection of Antibody-induced Complement Activation on Red Blood Cells
06:29

Methods for Quantitative Detection of Antibody-induced Complement Activation on Red Blood Cells

Published on: January 29, 2014

30.6K
Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

4.0K

科学领域:

  • 临床免疫学和诊断 临床免疫学和诊断
  • 自动抗体检测方法 自动抗体检测方法
  • 风湿病学和自身免疫性疾病

背景情况:

  • 抗脂抗体 (aPL) 测试对于诊断抗脂综合征 (APS) 是必不可少的.
  • 2023年ACR/EULAR分类标准强调与酶相关的免疫吸收试验 (ELISA) 和特定的阳性值.
  • 越来越多的非ELISA方法在临床实践中需要与传统的ELISA进行比较.

研究的目的:

  • 为了比较和评估ELISA和非ELISA (化学发光免疫测试 - CLIA) 抗脂抗体测试的性能.
  • 评估这些方法在现实世界医院环境中的一致性和临床相关性.
  • 确定测试方法对抗脂综合征分类的影响.

主要方法:

  • 使用ELISA和CLIA测量了抗心脂蛋白 (aCL) 和抗β2糖蛋白I (aß2GPI) 抗体 (IgG和IgM).
  • 在2021年1月至2024年6月期间,对946个样本进行了并行测试.
  • 结果与临床和实验室特征的一致性和关联性进行了比较,包括APS诊断.

主要成果:

  • 总体上,ELISA和CLIA之间的一致性仅在aß2GPI IgG上是可接受的;在aCL IgG/IgM和aß2GPI IgM上观察到的一致性很差.
  • 在APS患者中,对aß2GPI IgG和IgM的一致性是可以接受的,但对aCL IgG和IgM的一致性很差.
  • 与ELISA相比,CLIA在APS患者中显示出显著更高的抗体水平,影响了阳性率和分类.

结论:

  • 在aPL测试中,ELISA和CLIA之间存在大量依赖方法的差异,影响了定量和质量结果.
  • 虽然这两种方法都可以用于APS分类,但测试的选择可能会影响诊断结果.
  • 对aPL结果的临床解释需要仔细考虑所采用的特定测试方法.