替代的不和声:预先注册的元分析
Sara Jaubert1, Adrien Alejandro Fillon2, Lionel Souchet1
1Aix Marseille University, Aix-en-Provence, France.
Personality & social psychology bulletin
|August 10, 2024
概括
观察群内不一致会引起不适,这种现象被称为代理认知失调. 这一元分析证实了一种小但显著的效应,强调了需要可复制的研究设计的需要.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
背景情况:
- 代理性认知失调描述了观察群内成员行为不一致时所经历的不适.
- 理论上,这种不适是激发不和减轻的动机.
研究的目的:
- 以元分析的方式检查代理认知失调的效果大小.
- 探索潜在的调节者和出版偏见在代理认知失调研究.
主要方法:
- 对24项研究进行了元分析,共有16769名参与者.
- 使用3PSM和R-index等方法评估了出版偏差.
主要成果:
- 发现了代理认知失调的一个小,统计学上显著的效应大小 (g = 0.41).
- 在研究结果中观察到显著的变化.
- 出版偏差分析表明,真正的效果大小可能比最初指出的要小,可能因小样本大小而膨胀.
结论:
- 代用性认知失调是一种可证明的心理现象,其效果规模很小.
- 需要通过改进的方法设计进行进一步的研究,以确保可复制性并澄清潜在的心理过程.
更多相关视频
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
5.3K
09:49Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
14.1K
相关概念视频
Cognitive Dissonance
32.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.6K
Self-Discrepancy Theory
18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
18.3K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
190
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
190
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
155
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
155
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
