时间在潜原因推理中的无处不在.
Dan-Mircea Mirea1, Yeon Soon Shin2, Sarah DuBrow3
1Princeton University.
Journal of cognitive neuroscience
|August 13, 2024
概括
人类利用时间推断事件的潜在原因,偏爱最近观察到的原因. 一个"持久"的模型最好地解释了这种对潜在原因推断的时间影响.
科学领域:
- 认知科学 认知科学
- 计算神经科学是一种神经科学.
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
背景情况:
- 人类的概括依赖于对经验进行细分,并将其与过去的事件联系起来.
- 时间信息在概括和潜在原因推断中的作用尚未完全理解.
- 潜在原因推断模型基于共享的潜在原因将经验组合在一起.
研究的目的:
- 研究时间信息如何影响人类的潜在原因推断.
- 评估时间影响推理的不同计算模型.
主要方法:
- 开发了一个新的任务,参与者从"微生物"刺激中推断出"菌株" (潜在原因).
- 与"持久"模型和其他时间敏感模型对比人类的性能.
- 评估任务的心理测量特性和最合适的模型.
主要成果:
- 人类将时间信息纳入潜在原因推断中.
- 最近推断的潜在原因更有可能再次推断.
- 一个"持久"的模型,原因有可能继续存在,显著优于其他模型.
结论:
- 时间动态,特别是导致持久性,对于人类的概括至关重要.
- 开发的任务和"持久"模型提供了一种方法来量化推理中的个体差异.
- 这些发现对计算精神病学和神经成像研究有影响.
相关概念视频
Causality in Epidemiology
354
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
354
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
The Availability Heuristic
5.9K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
5.9K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
259
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
259
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
245
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
245
Correlation and Causation
37.5K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
37.5K


