描绘枪支暴力的受害者和公众对枪支政策的支持:一个实验分析
Colleen M Berryessa1, Michael Sierra-Arévalo2, Daniel C Semenza3
1School of Criminal Justice, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
概括
媒体对枪支暴力的描述显著影响了公众对枪支法规的支持. 受害者种族和事件类型,特别是大规模枪击事件,是塑造政策偏好的关键因素.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
- 媒体研究 媒体研究
背景情况:
- 媒体围绕枪支暴力的叙述具有影响力.
- 关于枪支监管的公众意见是复杂的和多方面的.
- 了解这些动态对于有效的政策制定至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查媒体报道中的受害者特征和事件类型如何影响公众对枪支法规的支持.
- 分析公众对解决枪支自杀,事故,大规模枪击和街头杀人的政策的差异性支持.
主要方法:
- 一个随机的实验是对美国大众的大样本进行的 (N = 3410).
- 参与者接触到媒体关于枪支暴力的报道,其受害者特征和事件类型各不相同.
主要成果:
- 受害者种族,特别是黑人种族,强烈预测对枪支法规的支持率较低.
- 根据事件类型,公众的支持有所不同:大规模枪击事件的支持率较高,枪支自杀/事故的支持率较低,与街头杀人事件相比.
- 受害者的性别,精神疾病,先前监禁和年龄的影响比种族和事件类型要小.
结论:
- 媒体对枪支暴力的报道对公众对枪支监管的支持有不同的影响.
- 叙述可以塑造针对特定类型枪支暴力的政策的支持,强调需要细微的沟通策略.
更多相关视频
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.6K
06:39Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements
Published on: August 28, 2017
14.3K
相关概念视频
Framing Effects
7.3K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.3K
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Bystander Effect
9.5K
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
9.5K
Archival Research
16.0K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
16.0K
Statistical Significance
20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Social Facilitation
31.9K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
31.9K
